Video duration: 445 seconds
Global video hits: 9230
MSNBC host Cenk Uygur speaks with AP reporter Charles Babington about potential 2012 Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's flip-flops and his popularity in the GOP base.
what the? hell? By: spaik007. on 22 May 11, 12:41:55 what the? hell?
That is the point ... By: Salvysahagun. on 09 May 11, 23:45:24 That is the point of forcefully paying someone to do something.
The reason healthcare cost are so high is because of government intervention.
The GOV shouldn't have? forced me along with the thousands of other suicide attempts to go to rehab.
WIth the Government forcefully increasing the demand on rehabs across the country it is only natural for the rehab centers to up their cost.
Supply and Demand 101
I can't really ... By: thenewvoice8. on 09 May 11, 12:01:55 I can't really decipher your point here?
I took from it that we should both be worrying about the high suicide rates in the US as well as the fact that you get fucked for such high healthcare costs. I go back to my point about European systems - you? wouldn't have been $29k out of pocket, a bonus for someone just after they have attempted suicide I would think - since money problems lead to attempts this seems like a poor form of rehab to me
Turns? out Donald ... By: mavishill. on 07 May 11, 13:50:26 Turns? out Donald Duck is a opportunistic Fox..
You won the ... By: westideas. on 03 May 11, 18:47:23 You won the argument with "Salvysahagun". For someone like myself who isn't from America, I can see the clear contrast of the two main political views in your country, played out in your guys conversation. I must say, it is very refreshing reading these comments that are civil and deals with opinions based on some facts. If only the political discourse could be like this, America would be? in a much better place. Kudos to both of you.
But why won't you ... By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 18:31:56 But why won't you answer the question? You'd amend the constitution? without consulting the American people, then how could you maintain that "fixed" constitution against people who want it to include national public education etc.? Some people HATE small government. Why can't you understand this?
You're going in circles. Why not answer the question? You'd have to forcibly crush the revolutionaries who wanted to revive the constitution to allow bigger government, wouldn't you?
Tax is tax, is tax, ... By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 18:26:41 Tax is tax, is tax, is..... tax, = tax, which is tax. Tax is ALWAYS? ON ONE'S PROPERTY, no matter what kind of tax it is. And nobody's property, of any of the kinds you've mentioned, possesses a threat to society. The lack of tax could allow a threat to emerge, but that's a different matter. You really are splitting hairs, and? clutching at straws in terms of find a "constitutional self-violation".
The kind of tax is ... By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 18:21:48 The kind of tax is left up to the people, in how they vote. Income, sales, business transaction, are all things the people can choose as to what they prefer.
Check out your congressmen/presidential candidates, and vote for? the one that gives the scheme you prefer, or no tax at all (e.g. Ron Paul).
You say: "You don't ... By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 18:14:06 You say: "You don't have a "right" to someone else's service."
Then why not get rid of all government? Police, military, fire department, postal service, road workers - these are all "someone else's? service".
Right?
Their wouldn't be ... By: Salvysahagun. on 29 Apr 11, 17:38:53 Their wouldn't be revolutions if government was small.
Thats why the founding fathers wanted small federal? government, and delegate the remaining powers to the state and/or individuals as stated in the 10th amendment.
That way if their won't be revolutions because there'd be nothing to revolt against.
And if a State didn't follow the guidelines then theyd be booted out and would not be granted the protection of the union
Taxes where ... By: Salvysahagun. on 29 Apr 11, 17:35:43 Taxes where originally intended to function as a? sales tax, business transaction, and tariffs.
Not on income.
one's income is ones property thats what your failing to understand bud.
An income tax is an unreasonable seizure because having my income is not a crime and posses no threat to society.
Not the case ... By: Salvysahagun. on 29 Apr 11, 17:32:47 Not the case because people can access social security on disability. So that rules that out.
Are you not aware that when education was in its prime in America the Federal Government had no say on how the states run it. Then right? when the Federal Government got involved (Department of Education was founded in 1979) things went down hill.
Their is no arguing that data.
Thats the other flaw.
You don't have a "right" to someone else's service.
If you didn't crush ... By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 16:59:42 If you didn't crush that particular revolution (the one that wants the constitution to be fully amendable again) by force, the constitution would simply revert to being fully amendable again, because you'd allow that armed revolution to prevail.?
Taxes are mandated ... By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 16:57:34 Taxes are mandated by the constitution, so does NOT constitute an "unreasonable seizure" referred to in? the 4th amendment, so the 16th Amendment does NOT violate the 4th Amendment. Rather the 16th Amendment reinforces Article 1 Section 8, which was already in the main body since the beginning.
If there was an armed revolution against your permanent constitutional outlawing of the provision of nationally guaranteed public education, emergency room etc., you'd HAVE to crush it.
So if social ... By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 16:49:04 So if social security was a fund that allowed everyone to access it in exactly the same way you'd be for it? Like a public road?
As for the purpose of national government, "provide for" the "General Welfare" is in the constitution. You may not consider social security, emergency room, public education etc. as "general welfare". But congress might, and that's what counts. Voters can simply vote for congressmen that? don't.
But that's a federal-level choice, not state-level.
No a hand out is ... By: Salvysahagun. on 29 Apr 11, 15:29:40 No a hand out is when pure cash or goods is given? out by the Government to an individual person or individual institution. Roads and Bridges are used by everyone even vistors. The federal government can only make institutions that benefit the nation as a whole. Things everyone can use.
The Purpose of the ... By: Salvysahagun. on 29 Apr 11, 15:26:10 The Purpose of the national gov is to provide currency, defense from foreign invaders, regulate trade, manage immigration among few other things the rest are state? rights.
Why can't you understand that?
I was suggesting ... By: Salvysahagun. on 29 Apr 11, 15:24:52 I was suggesting repeals or violations of the main body to be banned.
Like i said the 16th is a direct violation of the 4th.
I couldn't crush them by force but it would be up to congress to realize that its unconstitutional and cannot? be done.
You must understand the constitution is the law of the land and if a state wants to be part of the union it must obey those rules or they can get out.
Anyone is entitled ... By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 14:58:25 Anyone is entitled to use the bridges and roads thus they are a handout.
The current constitution DOES allow amendments to the main body and to the bill of rights. THAT'S WHAT AMENDMENT MEANS. The 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 16th, 17th, 20th, 25th, 27th all amended the main? body.
If there was a revolution against your "fixed" constitution to allow nationally guaranteed public schools, emergency room etc., which you explicitly disallowed, would you crush that revolution by force?
Those? are NOT hand ... By: Salvysahagun. on 29 Apr 11, 14:18:36 Those? are NOT hand outs.
Anybody can use bridges or roads thus they are a public service
Of course but their would be strict restrictions.
Example no amendment can counterdict the bill of rights or anything in the main body.
Like 16th amendment is a direct violation of the 4th.
With respect, ... By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 14:15:48 With respect, bridges and roads are a government hand out.
But would your revised constitution? be amendable, so that if people wanted nationally guaranteed public education, emergency room, they could have it?
Amendable, yes or no?
Video duration: 239 seconds
Global video hits: 16296
FAKE SUBS! THIS IS A JOKE DON'T TAKE SERIOUSLY. YIPEEEEE Our first partner project since a long time :D SHINEE IS LOVE We were sad that we weren't the first to make a parody :( but here it is! our first shinee video uploaded onto THIS channel :D wooooooo Lyrics: derphyo & RedpaperClip21 Subbing: derphyo & RedpaperClip21
Can I pay you? back ... By: HanABi77Hyuu. on 23 Mar 12, 20:31:08 Can I pay you? back by offering my body? xD I'm willing!! lmao
That awkward moment ... By: jigglypuffaddict100. on 18 Feb 12, 16:34:39 That awkward moment when a fan actually thought? these are the real lyrics.
Rotfl!! This was so ... By: lilypinkpuff1456. on 07 Feb 12, 21:02:03 Rotfl!! This was so funny. It made my day. I hope you? make more parodies. Because I love them all.
This is barely a? ... By: jtulifua. on 29 Jan 12, 19:32:21 This is barely a? parody!
This takes? one of ... By: totaltwinconnection2. on 27 Jan 12, 01:30:46 This takes? one of their worst music videos...and improves it. I laughed so hard XD
OMG. I? am dying. I ... By: Xmizzy012. on 24 Jan 12, 10:00:41 OMG. I? am dying. I can't do this anymore. I have fallen and i can't get up. +favorites
This video is so ... By: lilypinkpuff1456. on 24 Jan 12, 02:57:32 This video is so funny. I like Shinee, but? this video is just so funny. I love it. I hope you make more!!
I don't see any ... By: WASABIIO. on 21 Jan 12, 16:17:46 I don't see any difference to the official? one..?
.i don't know if ... By: Warina13. on 14 Jan 12, 01:50:04 .i don't know if i'm crying or laughing right now..but i can't stop. This is too good especially because my job is somehow related to the? parody *dies laughing*
click on that cc ... By: shiningturtle11. on 11 Jan 12, 16:15:28 click on that cc button at the right? end of the vid
I dint? see any ... By: hiphoptothehigh. on 03 Jan 12, 23:26:14 I dint? see any subbs or hear any change in the music
I love how they're ... By: TheWooHooism. on 29 Dec 11, 08:51:40 I love how they're smiling in the video while all of this is being said? xP
"you can pay us in? ... By: aniesunique11. on 25 Dec 11, 06:15:18 "you can pay us in? chicken!!" lol we all know who said that xDD
lol i would? want ... By: aniesunique11. on 25 Dec 11, 06:12:38 lol i would? want to get a "surprise adoption" from shinee!!! :DD
LOL! THIS IS ... By: VampireKittyKittyKat. on 17 Dec 11, 23:45:35 LOL! THIS IS FRICKEN? HYSTERICAL!
got to be one of my ... By: loveheartheart. on 17 Dec 11, 23:35:06 got to be one of my most favorite shinee hello? parodies. ;)
Taemin: "Better run ... By: YamapiFanForever3. on 23 Nov 11, 14:08:26 Taemin: "Better run for your life" XD XD? XD
This... this... ... By: dreamer921618. on 17 Nov 11, 02:51:45 This... this... this so freaking funny. In all seriousness I cry i'm laughing so? hard when I watch this
hahahaha " u can ... By: DBZanimeluver12. on 07 Nov 11, 23:50:52 hahahaha " u can pay? us in chicken"
haha
taemin " Oh ... By: 72sunisa. on 03 Nov 11, 05:28:38 haha
taemin " Oh no, i'm? in your house"
haha wish he culd be in mi lol
I loved it ! "You ... By: JuustMeeOnlyMee. on 25 Oct 11, 16:38:20 I loved it ! "You can pay? us in chicken", bu Onew LOL !
"you wont believe ... By: rockoncarly. on 23 Oct 11, 05:31:44 "you wont believe the work fangirls? are willing to do" SO TRUE!!!!!
Sh!t I should ... By: PsunXmin2. on 21 Oct 11, 21:43:13 Sh!t I should really pay them back.. this is getting dangerous ; )?
Pay us back in? ... By: Ringochan13. on 19 Oct 11, 10:12:16 Pay us back in? chicken :D
HAHAHAH YOU'RE ... By: waddupanna. on 13 Oct 11, 04:04:10 HAHAHAH YOU'RE REALLY GOOD AT? THIS! The lines totally matched their actions. I will never look at their innocent smiles the same way again LOL
Video duration: 372 seconds
Global video hits: 43329
Republican Congressman Joe Walsh is allegedly a dead-beat dad according to his ex-wife who is fighting to get 9 years worth of child support. This is ironic because Walsh has been a harsh critic of President Obama and government spending. Cenk Uygur explains. Google+: www.gplus.to Facebook: www.facebook.com Twitter: twitter.com Subscribe: bit.ly
"This is where real ... By: feedyourmind420. on 24 May 12, 17:48:21 "This is where real America is"...He's actually pretty spot on with that? comment, real America also has massive debts it has been welshing on
plus... she's not ... By: MrAmericaRules. on 19 May 12, 23:20:11 plus... she's not even hot and she? is complaining.
All these? two do, ... By: MrAmericaRules. on 19 May 12, 23:18:26 All these? two do, is complain about people's personal lives...
Clinton managed to ... By: MrAmericaRules. on 19 May 12, 23:17:22 Clinton managed to get a big chunk taken out in 8 years when literally nothing happened though... So, when are people? going to realize that our debt is fucking inevitable?
lol everyone in the ... By: MrAmericaRules. on 19 May 12, 23:12:33 lol everyone in the US... you idiots. Its multiplying every term, lol, just because it went up more during Bush's term has nothing to do with anything other than that we're a big country and have a bigger footprint. From Reagan's to Bush Sr.'s term it multiplied? by 2 and that was in 4 years, similar with Carter and Ford... Bush's results are an achievement I'd say, 8 years and a war and he still only went up by double.
What a dick.? By: IAmJordanBradley. on 26 Apr 12, 05:33:09 What a dick.?
Joe Walsh is a ... By: Brivonn3. on 28 Feb 12, 18:27:09 Joe Walsh is a total asshole! He's willing to dick ride the government but not bother to take care of his own? kids, putting money toward a campaign he's guaranteed to not win....loser ass deadbeat father!
Um. . .? my wife ... By: dagda825. on 17 Feb 12, 14:37:06 Um. . .? my wife and I never missed a penny in child support for her kids once. in 10 years of paying.
I think his wife ... By: emmyjo720. on 17 Feb 12, 13:42:54 I think his wife has the financial troubles...?
If he needs a ... By: Pathaway3. on 03 Feb 12, 15:43:38 If he needs a calculator to figure what he owes,? he might try the DeadBeat Spreadsheet.
- Indeed. ... By: A86. on 01 Feb 12, 17:45:35 - Indeed. Politicians are so bad these days you have to measure them in "Which one was the least harmful" terms. Very sad? and infuriating. I just think Clinton was the "least harmful" President since Nixon, not that Clinton was very good.
It's a sad state of ... By: rza1m. on 01 Feb 12, 02:18:44 It's a sad state of affairs when the government is? unable to balance the federal budget let alone the deficit.
- He left with a ... By: A86. on 01 Feb 12, 02:16:04 - He left with a federal budget surplus but still helped increase the national debt (not the same thing). But, Clinton did increase the national debt by? the lowest margin of any US President since the 70s.
I thought Clinton ... By: rza1m. on 31 Jan 12, 23:09:08 I thought Clinton left office with? a surplus?
LOL
? By: stained91109. on 20 Dec 11, 07:13:47 LOL
?
THIS? MONEY IS FOR ... By: freelandwhippet. on 09 Dec 11, 03:53:01 THIS? MONEY IS FOR HIS CHILD. HIS CHILD. HIS CHILD. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO MORE FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE SITUATION THAN ENSURING YOUR CHILD RECEIVES the absolute best childhood financially possible. Further, instead of paying SOME of the support. he is paying NOTHING because he is disputing the amount. He is not arguing that he owes SOME money, just that it is not 117000$. If this was ANYONE else, such as you or I, we would be IN JAIL. No question about it.
Excellent point my ... By: freelandwhippet. on 09 Dec 11, 03:50:36 Excellent point my friend. This guy is a horrific? dead beat who rails on Obama about financial and economic issues, but he owes his wife ASTRONOMIC amounts of money AND.. the money isn't to some bullshit situation or questionable creditor.(COntinued)
Sadly, this Joe ... By: LittleMissLeared. on 08 Dec 11, 19:32:32 Sadly, this Joe Walsh asshole is what conservatives think is a good man. Hell, nowadays you could be a child molester and still be considered? a good conservative as long as you are anti-Obama.
You have? no idea ... By: SpikeyJamez. on 13 Nov 11, 05:54:47 You have? no idea how much I hate Joe Walsh soooo much.
and its all? ... By: kloneo. on 12 Nov 11, 04:08:15 and its all? republicans :D
Is the Conman? Joe ... By: allgoo19. on 12 Nov 11, 03:28:01 Is the Conman? Joe Walsh a used car salesman by trade?
If not, what his real job?
DID? DICK HEAD ... By: kn9ioutom. on 12 Nov 11, 00:11:14 DID? DICK HEAD WALSH EVER PAY HIS CHILD SUPPORT ?
I'm one of the ... By: RickJames1811. on 15 Oct 11, 18:38:49 I'm one of the people President Obama calls "rich". I make over 250K but I don't feel rich...I didn't agree with the stimulus either... BTW..> In America...when is it? NOT a race issue?
Since he didn't ... By: sydneycouch. on 16 Sep 11, 01:03:17 Since he didn't show up for his child support hearing in Illinois on 9/13/11 because he alledgedly HAD to be in DC to vote (he voted present which neither yes or no) & he had to do media spots the Illinois Judge should have issued a judgment immediately; and or issued a warrant for his arrest & a surrender of his drivers license. That's? what regular citizens get.
This video gives a ... By: NationalHomebuyers. on 25 May 12, 09:01:11 This video gives a really interesting perspective, an interesting watch.? Thanks, National Homebuyers
Sounds like an ... By: UmTheMuse. on 14 May 12, 19:32:10 Sounds like an ingenious pyramid scheme, in a way, in that there's no value creation? and each level is made to push the risk to the next level down. However, doesn't the IB face a new risk?
It seems to me that they now are at risk because they have to guess how much money they can get from investors.
Even discounting agent-principal problems, it seems like the total risk should be higher, right?
3 people lost money ... By: PhilipTheDuke. on 01 May 12, 17:25:00 3 people lost money in MBS's?
Gays check out how ... By: nokkont. on 19 Apr 12, 19:30:00 Gays check out how to become popular? Russian invention
/watch?v=Y-pztzYMasA&feature=g-upl&context=G2f02875AUAAAAAAAAAA
When the bank Sells ... By: devbodaghe. on 19 Feb 12, 02:38:01 When the bank Sells their mortgages to investment banks dont they charge a lil interest that way? there not just making their not just making their money back
I just want to ... By: helloworld0714. on 30 Dec 11, 13:47:34 I just want to clarify, the investment bank creates new corporation/? entity? what are example of this newly created corporations?
The? 2 billion ... By: 01agni1. on 23 Dec 11, 09:20:54 The? 2 billion dollars are cashflows over 10 years.Hence they are not comparable to 100 M made now.To understand this further go to the concept of time value of money.
it's just a matter ... By: kweezyyy. on 06 Dec 11, 20:27:52 it's just a matter of the investment banks pushing the risk off their own plates. once IB's sell all the "corporation" shares, it doesn't matter as much to the IB? if people default on their mortgage payments and the corporation's cash flow dries up
who are some of ... By: rond02kg. on 07 Nov 11, 23:29:55 who are some of these "special purpose entities" you speak? of?
The math and the ... By: chocoboblue99. on 30 Sep 11, 01:59:59 The math and the model looks fun to play around with until someone defaults.
Then, a few more defaults and then there's a domino effect and everyone? has a sad face now. :(
just got one ... By: tcg4111. on 26 Sep 11, 20:35:22 just got one question and hopefully you can answer it soon enough for it to help...
why does the INVESTMENT BANK (green bank) make up a corporation which sells shares letting investors bank? off the interest and principle payment as well? and therefore making only 100 M (in this case), when, if they kept the rights to the mortage payments to themselves, theyd eventually be making 2 billion dollars (in this case)? provided the investmEnt bank had enough money to buy the rights from the LOCAL BANK
just got one ... By: tcg4111. on 26 Sep 11, 20:34:56 just got one question and hopefully you can answer it soon enough for it to help...
why does the INVESTMENT BANK (green bank) make up a corporation which sells shares letting investors bank? off the interest and principle payment as well? and therefore making only 100 M (in this case), when, if they kept the rights to the mortage payments to themselves, theyd eventually be making 2 billion dollars (in this case)? provided the investmEnt bank had enough money to buy the rights from the LOCAL BANK
just got one ... By: tcg4111. on 26 Sep 11, 20:34:45 just got one question and hopefully you can answer it soon enough for it to help...
why does the INVESTMENT? BANK (green bank) make up a corporation which sells shares letting investors bank off the interest and principle payment as well? and therefore making only 100 M (in this case), when, if they kept the rights to the mortage payments to themselves, theyd eventually be making 2 billion dollars (in this case)? provided the investmEnt bank had enough money to buy the rights from the LOCAL BANK
Hats off to Creater ... By: kannu12341. on 02 Aug 11, 18:39:45 Hats off to Creater of that movies.....awesome? Explanation with simple examples.......:) Thanks a lot
eASY & High Income ... By: NetTopJOB. on 30 Jul 11, 00:17:01 eASY & High Income Job from the "NET"
forex-secrets@hotmail.com
?
very? clear,
great ... By: RebelHQ. on 29 Jul 11, 06:57:21 very? clear,
great stuff :]
Weren't securitized ... By: doublek321. on 18 Jul 11, 12:25:56 Weren't securitized mortgages traded on the open market? If so, it seems strange? to me that they would be since isn't there an upper limit to how much they should be able to go up? In this example, even if all the people actually pay their mortgages, they only have to pay 7% interest. Therefore, there's an upper limit on the income stream. I'm wondering if these things ever traded above their potential worth (and if so - why)
where does the FNMA ... By: prakashenator. on 24 May 11, 16:36:19 where does the FNMA,? GNMA, FHLMC comes into play?
nice and ... By: jaggernat. on 27 Mar 11, 13:40:24 nice and clear.thanks.?
It is important to ... By: spectrum0590. on 13 Dec 10, 08:35:54 It is important to own a home rather than renting.? It is a long term investment compare if you prefer to rent. It's a waste of money.
Thanks, Wikipedia ... By: joskoning. on 07 Dec 10, 20:43:10 Thanks, Wikipedia made no sense to me about this, as? usual.
The reason why Sal ... By: JasonRox88. on 25 Nov 10, 22:09:23 The reason why Sal is so successful at teaching because he knows his topics.
I believe the education system in the US/Canada is failing mainly because so many teachers fail to know their own topic. The focus is largely on teaching methods which in my opinion is useless without? a proper understanding of the topic. I have seen easily hundreds (former teaching assistant) of students go into teaching and are CLUELESS to what they teach. They are motivated and great people but they are CLUELESS.
@honest 4truth
i ... By: TopBreh. on 25 Nov 10, 17:00:13 @honest 4truth
i fink the investment banks set up the special purpose vehicles/entities (spv/spe) so they cud get the loans off their balance sheets.
in this video he says investment banks may have done this because they are not in the business of dealing with mortgage loans however i? rekon that they knew a number of these loans were very very risky and so transferred this risk onto shareholders, mutual funds, hedge funds and pension funds etc.
This is the first ... By: ZSa7NBuA. on 22 May 12, 12:11:51 This is the first Kha nAcademy video am seeing and I hope there not all this poor. There's no difference? between paper money and gold??? Intrinsic value, no counterparty risk. An ounce of gold will always be an ounce of gold. The same cannot be said of fiat. Never has, never will. In the words of JP Morgan, gold is money, everything else is credit.
It's very ... By: UmTheMuse. on 18 May 12, 20:26:08 It's very uselessness is part of why it used to be used as the international standard. If people were using goats or whatever, that's a barter economy. There would be no standard.
For example, how much is a goat worth? Well, if it's alive, somebody might want it for? milk. I wouldn't, because I don't care for goat milk. If it's dead, it might be worth a different amount, depending on who feels like having goat meat.
Now that gold has intrinsic value, it is worth different amounts.
Gays check out how ... By: nokkont. on 19 Apr 12, 19:37:47 Gays check out how to become? popular Russian invention
/watch?v=Y-pztzYMasA&feature=g-upl&context=G2f02875AUAAAAAAAAAA
You sir are an A** ... By: noorelahi1997. on 18 Apr 12, 17:28:09 You sir are an A**hole?
Seriously? He's a? ... By: DerShermanator. on 15 Apr 12, 18:17:29 Seriously? He's a? retired hedge fund manager. I think he knows more about the banking system than some guy who read a couple pamphlets.
I lost interest ... By: iknama. on 13 Apr 12, 16:51:07 I lost interest when he said there was a pool of savings... He obviously doesn't? understand the fractional reserve system.
There is no such thing as reserves or savings... just numbers in a computer.
I would suggest a careful read of Modern Money Mechanics and End the Fed
khanacademy, you " ... By: cullisonjt. on 08 Apr 12, 14:28:35 khanacademy, you "have" to do work for gold no matter what the circumstances but not the same could not be said about paper. A good question in a fee market system why is there only one "private" Fed? Who always wins? Banks win in up and down times. Its a cartel. The? simple fact that they are "private" and in control of the money supply with no competition should raise your eyebrow. Legalize competing currencies. Like you siad the colonies did it.
good point!
... By: Bouncertt. on 05 Apr 12, 16:22:42 good point!
scientists even? started using for treating cancer (gold nanoparticels)
Thank you very much ... By: Gelitifa. on 05 Apr 12, 08:38:49 Thank you very much for sharing. I will follow your videos for sure. I really find your videos very interesting but I have something to say? regarding your comment on gold not being useful apart from being pretty. Gold is actually very important in electronics because of its good conductivity and general resistance to oxidation and corrosion in other environments (including resistance to non-chlorinated acids) has led to its widespread industrial use.
Wonder how you feel ... By: MultiHappyballs. on 01 Apr 12, 20:20:01 Wonder how you feel about gold as compared to the dollar today??
"It is? well enough ... By: Nautilus1972. on 01 Apr 12, 09:53:22 "It is? well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."
-Henry Ford
"If Americans ever ... By: Nautilus1972. on 01 Apr 12, 09:53:18 "If Americans ever allow banks to control the issue of their currency,? first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children will wake up homeless"
- Thomas Jefferson
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws."
- Mayer Amschel Rothschild
And remember that ... By: Nautilus1972. on 01 Apr 12, 09:52:52 And remember that they lend out much more than that. Wall street derivatives allow people to bet on markets falling, the people who have? the power to collapse those markets are their biggest investors. Increase money supply = boom. Decrease money supply = recession. All recessions are deliberately caused by the big banks. This is basic economics.
Because it is ... By: Nautilus1972. on 01 Apr 12, 09:49:43 Because it is unconstitutional for a cadre of private banks, such as the Federal Reserve, to control money supply. They lend every dollar printed at interest to the Government - they are not 'Federal' in the slightest. This is why? the loan made to the government in 1933 can never be paid off and partly the reason why the country is 15T in debt. It's a scam that will be 100 years old next year. Research 'money as debt' and wake up.
gold IS more ... By: HandsOffLibya. on 31 Mar 12, 00:41:06 gold IS more valuable than paper and always will be. Paper currencies always fail in the long-run no matter how much they buy? in the present.
Khan, I admire what ... By: debluecat. on 28 Mar 12, 02:55:06 Khan, I admire what you have done? so far. How kind you are.
4:00 hahaha he said ... By: Aaronandfabs. on 27 Mar 12, 19:17:31 4:00 hahaha he said dig :3?
Succee to Invite 1 ... By: delindaiamajyc34Rg. on 03 Mar 12, 12:13:16 Succee to Invite 1 friend to jion IPHONE4 Lucky Draw,more? draw code you get!NOT MISS! I8QZBI accuc.info
*very deep voice* ... By: TheTidalforce. on 03 Mar 12, 09:58:14 *very deep voice* let me? just draw it.
-
" Its sole value ... By: Edbrad. on 27 Feb 12, 16:26:20 -
" Its sole value is not in being "pretty."? "
-
It may have uses, but its main reason for being valued highly IS because its pretty.
-
How isnt it an ... By: Edbrad. on 27 Feb 12, 16:25:46 -
How isnt it an asset??
It touched a nerve ... By: StopTheMorons. on 25 Feb 12, 02:37:57 It touched a nerve for me and I can see by the comments for many others as well? when he said gold is valued because it's "pretty".
the fractional ... By: yaqubali. on 23 Feb 12, 23:18:46 the fractional banking simply means if a bank? has 100 dollars they can loan out 1000 dollars creating 900$ out of thin air... that's simply wrong
Not necessarily. It ... By: earlrhee. on 23 Feb 12, 22:29:40 Not necessarily. It usually serves as a buffer? against deflation.
That is incorrect ... By: QCREIGN. on 21 Feb 12, 04:26:18 That is incorrect about gold. Gold is a superconductive metal. It has electronic? and industrial applications. Not to mention it has been a store of value for thousands of years.
The West/NATO?? ... By: Metsada007. on 13 Jan 12, 19:45:02 The West/NATO?? always invades and plunders and massacres to bring freedom and prosperity to other nations. Westerners are incredibly kind-hearted people, they have been doing this for 500 years now.
Interesting theory, ... By: marinadzeb. on 01 Dec 11, 21:03:13 Interesting theory, at least much more plausible then protecting the civilians or giving "poor, suffering" people of Lybia the" gift" of democracy. ?
You are right. The ... By: 1000schwanzlutscher. on 24 Oct 11, 13:24:27 You are right. The guys who come after Gaddafi want the Sharia. I really hope that it? gets better in Lybia, but the people remain in medieval times. There thinking is still like: "An eye for an eye." So, bad perspectives for Lybia.
Funny fact is that ... By: foedusitalicum. on 24 Oct 11, 10:52:16 Funny fact is that the guys that sodomized him with a wooden stick will hang homosexual people because they are incoherent theocratic? rats.
The fuckin Gaddafi ... By: 1000schwanzlutscher. on 20 Oct 11, 12:02:27 The fuckin Gaddafi is? finally dead! YEAH! Yippi-Ya-Yeh motherfucker!
The really big ... By: davisoneill. on 14 Oct 11, 01:41:04 The really big question is why did Russia and China allow the UN resolution against Libya. They knew very well what Nato would do. Their pretended shock at Nato's abuse of the resolution will fool nobody but the more naive. I think it comes back to the dollar and the Gold Dinar. Both China and Russia - particularly China - are heavily exposed to US debt. The fall in the? dollar that the Gold Dinar would have brought about would have cost them billions.
Its sad when a man ... By: GulpTheRedPill. on 24 Sep 11, 13:30:24 Its sad when a man halfway around the world knows more about America than Americans!?
I clicked it but? ... By: 40joel. on 13 Jul 11, 03:08:40 I clicked it but? no cc came up
By claiming there ... By: BoudiccaBlanc. on 09 Jul 11, 11:59:58 By claiming there were WMD, Bush & Co. got Congress's permission to invade Iraq. therefore no impeachment after the 90-day time, etc.
At first, I believed the Bush Adm. story about 9-11 (I watched it on TV!) but after about a year I began to have doubts .... But by then, they were gearing up for Iraq!.
In my opinion; the "NWO" (for lack of a better word regarding the cabal running Washington DC) no longer felt the need to consult the American? people :((
Agreed, will they ... By: manopeaceYV4. on 09 Jul 11, 08:10:34 Agreed, will they say no, or cowtow because of the economy`s continued dollar decline? Thank god hes got to get permission, don`t know how bushes did it. No impeachment, no weapons, wmd, would have been a more credible argument/logical conclusion, congress dosen`t have the spirit to finally stand up to anyone, disheartening? to say the least. Obama for this, bush Jr, for that, clinton for white lies, all worthy, but really just a soap opera to sway the people for another 3 1/2 yr
Thats why? u r ... By: manopeaceYV4. on 09 Jul 11, 08:00:02 Thats why? u r frozen.
They "sole" our ... By: BoudiccaBlanc. on 05 Jul 11, 17:13:04 They "sole" our constitutional rights, little by little. Most people didn't even notice.
Obama doesn't even bother to make the pretense (as did Bush 1 & 2) of even addressing Congress!
His 90 days (War Powers Act--1973) are up. He has to go to Congress to get money.
We shall see.
Will Congress cave in?? to Obama's ignoring them or his veto of the bill to stop funding?
Will Congress have the guts to impeach Obama if he doesn't comply?
Brothers and ... By: manopeaceYV4. on 20 Jun 11, 12:45:24 Brothers and sisters, it`s sad but true. ? obama, bush jr., blow job billy C, bush sr, all corporte yes men, all the same> I love my country, not the present leaders, hope we can right ourselves. Good principles, ethics forgotten.
I have no? idea ... By: ColdBoi. on 12 Jun 11, 00:42:24 I have no? idea what they are saying.
Reason 4 attack on ... By: heavensentboy. on 23 May 11, 07:51:51 Reason 4 attack on Libya?Gaddafi
1 Criticizing US 4 Afghan invasion in UN, saying "Taliban is not my enemy" & calling Security Council a Terrorism Council. NO
2 Insisting on a? mutual Arab Nuclear program in the Arab leauge conference. NO
3 Killing of civilians by Gaddafi forces. NO
4 Calling 4 Jihad against Swiss bcoz of minerats ban. NO
5 Accused Israel 4 killing JFK. NO
6 Gaddafi wants Gold in return 4 Oil. YES
watch?v=GuqZfaj34nc
watch?v=v1lw1N5gTwI
watch?v=hwPzIvSX3J4
someone give that ... By: lexbvl. on 15 May 11, 18:38:30 someone give that man? a beer! he deserves it.
click on the CC ... By: levonet33. on 08 May 11, 01:09:40 click on the CC closed captioning on the right bottom of the? screen
click on the? CC ... By: levonet33. on 08 May 11, 01:09:08 click on the? CC closed captioning on the right bottom of the screen
I? don't understand ... By: vossua. on 07 May 11, 14:12:05 I? don't understand Russian but I understand the subject at hand...
That's true. I'm ... By: KA3AXCTAH2030. on 06 May 11, 11:29:18 That's true. I'm sure Gaddafi is not a saint for sure, but the US is clearly the aggressor here and this clearly has nothing to do with protecting the civilians. A recent NATO airstrike has killed? Gaddafi's son and his three preteen grandkids. NATO then has rejected a cease-fire offer from Gaddafi. Is this how we protect civilian lives today and bring peace about - by killing kids? Have they seen these rebels? They're armed to their teeth guerillas! WTFFF is going on!!!
Why in the hell is ... By: MrHumanComputer. on 05 May 11, 22:10:33 Why in the hell is she questioning anyone?? She acts like she is against fairness and for wickedness. She should have stayed in bed.
Latest comments made on this video:
By: spaik007. on 22 May 11, 12:41:55
what the? hell?
By: Salvysahagun. on 09 May 11, 23:45:24
That is the point of forcefully paying someone to do something. The reason healthcare cost are so high is because of government intervention. The GOV shouldn't have? forced me along with the thousands of other suicide attempts to go to rehab. WIth the Government forcefully increasing the demand on rehabs across the country it is only natural for the rehab centers to up their cost. Supply and Demand 101
By: thenewvoice8. on 09 May 11, 12:01:55
I can't really decipher your point here? I took from it that we should both be worrying about the high suicide rates in the US as well as the fact that you get fucked for such high healthcare costs. I go back to my point about European systems - you? wouldn't have been $29k out of pocket, a bonus for someone just after they have attempted suicide I would think - since money problems lead to attempts this seems like a poor form of rehab to me
By: mavishill. on 07 May 11, 13:50:26
Turns? out Donald Duck is a opportunistic Fox..
By: westideas. on 03 May 11, 18:47:23
You won the argument with "Salvysahagun". For someone like myself who isn't from America, I can see the clear contrast of the two main political views in your country, played out in your guys conversation. I must say, it is very refreshing reading these comments that are civil and deals with opinions based on some facts. If only the political discourse could be like this, America would be? in a much better place. Kudos to both of you.
By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 18:31:56
But why won't you answer the question? You'd amend the constitution? without consulting the American people, then how could you maintain that "fixed" constitution against people who want it to include national public education etc.? Some people HATE small government. Why can't you understand this? You're going in circles. Why not answer the question? You'd have to forcibly crush the revolutionaries who wanted to revive the constitution to allow bigger government, wouldn't you?
By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 18:26:41
Tax is tax, is tax, is..... tax, = tax, which is tax. Tax is ALWAYS? ON ONE'S PROPERTY, no matter what kind of tax it is. And nobody's property, of any of the kinds you've mentioned, possesses a threat to society. The lack of tax could allow a threat to emerge, but that's a different matter. You really are splitting hairs, and? clutching at straws in terms of find a "constitutional self-violation".
By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 18:21:48
The kind of tax is left up to the people, in how they vote. Income, sales, business transaction, are all things the people can choose as to what they prefer. Check out your congressmen/presidential candidates, and vote for? the one that gives the scheme you prefer, or no tax at all (e.g. Ron Paul).
By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 18:14:06
You say: "You don't have a "right" to someone else's service." Then why not get rid of all government? Police, military, fire department, postal service, road workers - these are all "someone else's? service". Right?
By: Salvysahagun. on 29 Apr 11, 17:38:53
Their wouldn't be revolutions if government was small. Thats why the founding fathers wanted small federal? government, and delegate the remaining powers to the state and/or individuals as stated in the 10th amendment. That way if their won't be revolutions because there'd be nothing to revolt against. And if a State didn't follow the guidelines then theyd be booted out and would not be granted the protection of the union
By: Salvysahagun. on 29 Apr 11, 17:35:43
Taxes where originally intended to function as a? sales tax, business transaction, and tariffs. Not on income. one's income is ones property thats what your failing to understand bud. An income tax is an unreasonable seizure because having my income is not a crime and posses no threat to society.
By: Salvysahagun. on 29 Apr 11, 17:32:47
Not the case because people can access social security on disability. So that rules that out. Are you not aware that when education was in its prime in America the Federal Government had no say on how the states run it. Then right? when the Federal Government got involved (Department of Education was founded in 1979) things went down hill. Their is no arguing that data. Thats the other flaw. You don't have a "right" to someone else's service.
By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 16:59:42
If you didn't crush that particular revolution (the one that wants the constitution to be fully amendable again) by force, the constitution would simply revert to being fully amendable again, because you'd allow that armed revolution to prevail.?
By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 16:57:34
Taxes are mandated by the constitution, so does NOT constitute an "unreasonable seizure" referred to in? the 4th amendment, so the 16th Amendment does NOT violate the 4th Amendment. Rather the 16th Amendment reinforces Article 1 Section 8, which was already in the main body since the beginning. If there was an armed revolution against your permanent constitutional outlawing of the provision of nationally guaranteed public education, emergency room etc., you'd HAVE to crush it.
By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 16:49:04
So if social security was a fund that allowed everyone to access it in exactly the same way you'd be for it? Like a public road? As for the purpose of national government, "provide for" the "General Welfare" is in the constitution. You may not consider social security, emergency room, public education etc. as "general welfare". But congress might, and that's what counts. Voters can simply vote for congressmen that? don't. But that's a federal-level choice, not state-level.
By: Salvysahagun. on 29 Apr 11, 15:29:40
No a hand out is when pure cash or goods is given? out by the Government to an individual person or individual institution. Roads and Bridges are used by everyone even vistors. The federal government can only make institutions that benefit the nation as a whole. Things everyone can use.
By: Salvysahagun. on 29 Apr 11, 15:26:10
The Purpose of the national gov is to provide currency, defense from foreign invaders, regulate trade, manage immigration among few other things the rest are state? rights. Why can't you understand that?
By: Salvysahagun. on 29 Apr 11, 15:24:52
I was suggesting repeals or violations of the main body to be banned. Like i said the 16th is a direct violation of the 4th. I couldn't crush them by force but it would be up to congress to realize that its unconstitutional and cannot? be done. You must understand the constitution is the law of the land and if a state wants to be part of the union it must obey those rules or they can get out.
By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 14:58:25
Anyone is entitled to use the bridges and roads thus they are a handout. The current constitution DOES allow amendments to the main body and to the bill of rights. THAT'S WHAT AMENDMENT MEANS. The 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 16th, 17th, 20th, 25th, 27th all amended the main? body. If there was a revolution against your "fixed" constitution to allow nationally guaranteed public schools, emergency room etc., which you explicitly disallowed, would you crush that revolution by force?
By: Salvysahagun. on 29 Apr 11, 14:18:36
Those? are NOT hand outs. Anybody can use bridges or roads thus they are a public service Of course but their would be strict restrictions. Example no amendment can counterdict the bill of rights or anything in the main body. Like 16th amendment is a direct violation of the 4th.
By: TheNavigateur. on 29 Apr 11, 14:15:48
With respect, bridges and roads are a government hand out. But would your revised constitution? be amendable, so that if people wanted nationally guaranteed public education, emergency room, they could have it? Amendable, yes or no?