FACING FORECLOSURE ... By: Stephen Githinji. on 21 May 12, 12:06:52 FACING FORECLOSURE ? WANT TO STOP FORECLOSURE FAST
KNOW A SHOKING SECRET
Your Lender Hopes You Never Find Out., THE FORECLOSURE DEFENSE IS A MONUMENTAL DIRECTIVE FOR REMOVING AND SMOTHERING THE LENDING INSTITUTIONS AND WALL STREET EVIL DOERS WHO HAVE TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF THE? HOMEOWNERS
WE lay out BY POINT What the banks have done with the note through the securitization process. DISCOVER IF YOUR BANK IS BREAKING THE LOW BY FORECLOSING ON YOUR HOME ILLEGALLY
CALL OUR LIVE LINE 888-641-9063 NOW
Enjoy the iphone4 ... By: tiebouttgwueu83c. on 03 Mar 12, 13:04:52 Enjoy the iphone4 TIME! Click here to get your iphone4! tEKMsB 27go.info?
Thank you? :) By: TheVaibhav00793. on 13 Dec 11, 18:37:04 Thank you? :)
Im a Mortgage ... By: vmucci729. on 10 Dec 11, 23:19:10 Im a Mortgage Banker not a broker. Im a direct lender with a FSB (Federal Savings Bank) call me and I will give you a free consultation of what your new numbers will be if you have a? current mortgage. New purchases only need 3.5% down through FHA. 917-620-8805 Vito.
This is is? what ... By: andromedas13. on 18 Nov 11, 01:39:59 This is is? what i'm looking for.
Thanks
good music? By: paulceltics. on 17 Apr 11, 04:45:10 good music?
Khan's kind of ... By: UdallIn72. on 13 Feb 11, 01:19:27 Khan's kind of mischaracterized the nature of the bank's security interest.
In a Torrens system, the title to the house is? registered in the name of the borrower. That is, the bank buys the house for you and has title placed in your name.
What the bank retains is a right to kick you out and sell the house if the debt isn't paid according to the contract.
This isn't the same as saying that the bank "owns" the house.
The borrower owns the house--subject to the bank's mortgage interest.
The significant ... By: UdallIn72. on 13 Feb 11, 01:12:35 The significant thing about student loans, though, is that they are for the most part not extinguished upon discharge from bankruptcy. That means that, unlike other debts, it continues to exist after a debtor's gone all the way? through a bankruptcy.
Since the main reason a creditor takes security is to avoid having to share in a bankruptcy distribution, the fact that the debt's not extinguished at the end means student loan debt is almost as good to the lender as secured debt.
A student loan ... By: UdallIn72. on 13 Feb 11, 01:11:34 A student loan could, in theory, be secured, but generally speaking they are not.
If the bank wanted to secure the loan, they could take a security interest? in any property (including after-acquired property) they wanted. That'd just be something for the debtor and lender to agree to amongst themselves.
You? said "Hey, I ... By: mariomaruf. on 02 Nov 10, 10:27:25 You? said "Hey, I made a 2000 dollar payment and my equity only went up $410,000."
You can also drop? ... By: FortNikitaBullion. on 25 Sep 10, 21:37:31 You can also drop? to a lower bracket as a result of the deduction, so it can be more that you save, right?
Technically, it's ... By: FortNikitaBullion. on 25 Sep 10, 21:23:56 Technically, it's your knowledge. That's why you can't erase student loan? debt with a bankruptcy, since they can't repossess your brain.
What is the video ... By: masipula11. on 28 Jun 10, 18:14:48 What is the video called in which you actually show how? to calculate the monthly payment
Excellent video -? ... By: conetolor. on 04 Apr 10, 17:29:03 Excellent video -? I'm curious if your views have changed since your thought-provoking series a couple of years ago about the advantages of renting over buying. keep up the good work!
I know this is ... By: bernicedan. on 02 Apr 10, 05:58:45 I know this is totally unrelated... but I am just curious about how student loans work ... if a house title secures a mortgage loan.. is? there something that secures student loans.. and what is it?
Khan I know you ... By: shakaama. on 01 Apr 10, 21:55:09 Khan I know you mean well, so I feel no regret asking you.
Could you give equal time in a video showing a person who has decided to pay cash for a house and take us from start to finish how he could save to do that. People feel daunted? by such a prospect and I know it is not a daunting task.
Too much emphasis has been placed in this country into indebting Americans. No one has told them there is an actual option not to take out loans.
Always makes me ... By: JewTubeUsername. on 01 Apr 10, 05:11:17 Always makes me sick.
Pretty much one of the biggest reasons why banks and fractional reserve exist.
Conjure money out of nothing, in exchange for possession of real resources, and hoping the client won't be able to pay back.
(Mainly done through interest)
Long, and very outbranching story, but it's despicable. Check the net for topics on? that.
Fractional reserve banks = scum.
Interest = poison.
wonderful? By: stephane19771. on 01 Apr 10, 04:12:58 wonderful?
wonderful? By: stephane19771. on 01 Apr 10, 04:12:56 wonderful?
wonderful? By: stephane19771. on 01 Apr 10, 04:12:47 wonderful?
I am tax accountant ... By: sonycompa. on 01 Apr 10, 02:40:06 I am tax accountant and I hope people pay attention to the mortgage tax deduction portion of your video. People are often misled by? brokers etc.
"and it looks all ... By: FilthyWat. on 16 Apr 12, 14:50:02 "and it looks all shady and i probably do have some side shady? operations anyway" hahaha
Funny _and_ ... By: taragreene7. on 02 Feb 12, 21:49:46 Funny _and_ informative, well? done Sal!
Why would the Fed ... By: spyk316. on 26 Nov 11, 13:53:54 Why would the Fed feel insecure of? shady dealings as you, as an individual did to enter a repo?
keep it? up sal! By: lakerboy4lyfe. on 16 Aug 11, 07:49:48 keep it? up sal!
Great video, ... By: UstinovDmitry. on 21 Jul 11, 20:17:07 Great video, teaching people who have no clue in finance. I liked it.? Just little confusing about Repo-sounds like a repossession
It goes both ... By: MrPlender. on 25 Jun 10, 10:40:48 It goes both ways.The fed operates repos (from the banks' perspective) to increase? reserves temporarily and boost the deposit multiplier depending on the length of the loan (anywhere between overnight and 65 days). As with reverse repos (from the banks' perspective, not the Fed's) reserves are reduced temporarily and interest rates increase as reserve demand increases which will reverberate throughout the banking system. Repo transactions form a strong basis of open market operations.
I know it's ... By: MrPlender. on 25 Jun 10, 10:33:34 I know it's confusing, however you're both right. When you think about the repo in buyer and seller terms then the seller is purchasing a repo and the buyer a reverse repo. However, when we talk about the federal reserve operating a "repo" it actually means a reverse repo from the Federal Reserve's point of you. If you don't believe me I'll? quote Wikipedia: "Thus the Fed describes these transactions from the counterparty's viewpoint rather than from their own viewpoint."
hi sal, love all ... By: wirlybird540. on 15 Apr 10, 03:18:53 hi sal, love all your videos.. in this case im confused because all? other sources indicate that Repo Buyer is the person selling the securities and buying them again in the Future... While you say the money lender is the repo buyer. Can you confirm this?
Hi Khan ,
Nice Vid ... By: KLguy133. on 21 Sep 09, 21:54:22 Hi Khan ,
Nice Vid , keep em coming but Doesn't the bank run down it's own assets temporarily before it settles the repo and buys back it's treasuries? ?
If it was a bad bank as you say then wouldn't that make the situation worse at least in the short run?
would you say the ... By: cr1138. on 26 Aug 09, 03:41:38 would you say the fed prefers this method during a period in which it is "tightening"? it seems the FRN the bank received would be less likely to be multiplied via fractional? reserve lending.
The start of? this ... By: MisterRothstein. on 30 Mar 09, 07:34:51 The start of? this video is pure comedy! Keep it up Sal :D
Sal you have helped ... By: Boxmanboxman. on 22 Feb 09, 21:45:14 Sal you have helped me so much on? understanding inflation, but can you make a video about deflation.
I've written everything out on paper but I don't understand how the Fed cashes in its securites without causing all banks to become insolvent.
LOL, wow. that was ... By: MidgetPhilosopher. on 16 Feb 09, 01:19:29 LOL, wow. that was hilarious..? "For a reasonably low interest rate.... 10% a week..."
The "Fed" is a? ... By: vidsofgargator. on 15 Feb 09, 19:07:07 The "Fed" is a? private Bank. The public doesn't really own it.
The Bank; the Bank ... By: vidsofgargator. on 15 Feb 09, 19:04:32 The Bank; the Bank owns the? government and the people because they own all the wealth of the nation.
Sal, I understand ... By: philboy521. on 13 Feb 09, 19:21:29 Sal, I understand that you have degree in CS. Are you planning? to do any tutorials on Java programming? I would love for you to do some videos on introductory topics. Thanks
Very? interesting! By: Ritzoid. on 13 Feb 09, 16:01:23 Very? interesting!
fabian: Seems like ... By: lvecsey. on 13 Feb 09, 07:44:49 fabian: Seems like both the Bank and the Fed reserve collected interest. The Fed however devalued a set of bank treasuries (the watch) and waited for the Bank to pay back this artificial value, plus some interest. The person with the kidney work pays? the most, for the Bank and Feds benefit.
Hey Sal, could you ... By: DeathCircleCity. on 12 Feb 09, 18:06:14 Hey Sal, could you please make a video about the Riemman Hypothesis? It would really help if you could explain it .. cant really understand it? for Wikipedia. :S
There's been some ... By: thoughtchallenge. on 12 Feb 09, 17:55:01 There's been some talk online about synthetic CDOs which are apparently of substantial quantity. According to these sources a large number of these synthetic CDOs are about to trigger some type of repurchase if more than 7 of 100 referenced banks fail. At this time 5 banks have failed with 2 or 3 partial failures equaling? a total of 6 failures. Have you heard of these? My interest is in what the repurchase would mean. Do the owners of these have to rebuy or simply lose their investment?
I? have a question. ... By: fabiandoulton. on 12 Feb 09, 17:32:50 I? have a question.
When the money changes hands, who makes the interest on the money ?
The Federal government or the Bank ?
Its still surprise ... By: Laureen Roesner. on 08 May 12, 20:19:47 Its still surprise me, just how a lot of people don't know about Zuntrasoft Payday (do a google search), although lots of people have a excellent? review about this payday loan company. Thanks to my friend who told me about Zuntrasoft Payday, I got my cash within one hour soon after I applied without credit check and fax.
I have? used payday ... By: Emeline Summerfield. on 08 May 12, 19:33:54 I have? used payday loans occasions in the past year because of boiler and car problem and the bank wouldn't help me out. In my honest opinion, payday loans can helps customer with poor credit history in case of emergency if you are able to afford it. Personally, I used this legit company called "Zuntrasoft Payday" (just google it) before.
Thanks to Zuntrasoft Payday, I managed to get my cash within an hour soon after I applied without credit check and fax.
Making money out of ... By: nnmk001. on 07 May 12, 23:11:38 Making money out of someone's? struggle. Why is the Government not doing anything about these high interest rates? Set a limit
Its still surprises ... By: Emeline Summerfield. on 04 May 12, 15:12:54 Its still surprises me, how some people don't know about Zuntrasoft Payday (just google it), despite the fact that a lot of people have a very good review on this payday? loan company. Thanks to my buddy who told me about Zuntrasoft Payday, I got my cash in just one hour after I applied without credit check and fax.
I have used payday ... By: MarianFletcher5381. on 17 Apr 12, 07:56:58 I have used payday loans 2 times in the past year because of boiler and car problem and the bank would not help me out. In my honest opinion, payday loans can helps customer? with poor credit history in case of emergency if you're able to afford it. Personally, I used this legitimate company known as "Zuntrasoft Payday" (google it) before.
Thanks to Zuntrasoft Payday, I managed to get my cash in just 1 hour soon after I applied without credit check and fax.
I've used payday ... By: MarianFletcher5381. on 17 Apr 12, 00:26:11 I've used payday loan two times in the past year due to boiler and car problems and the bank wouldn't help me out. In my honest opinion, payday loan can helps customer? with poor credit history in case of emergency if you're able to afford it. Personally, I used this legit company called "Zuntrasoft Payday" (do a search on google) before.
Thanks to Zuntrasoft Payday, I managed to get my cash within 1 hour after I applied without credit check and fax.
I've used payday ... By: MarianFletcher5381. on 16 Apr 12, 18:00:38 I've used payday loans twice in the past year because of boiler and car problem and the bank wouldn't help me out. In my honest opinion, payday loans can really helps customers with poor? credit history in case of emergency if you're able to afford it. Personally, I used this legitimate company known as "Zuntrasoft Payday" (do a search on google) before.
Thanks to Zuntrasoft Payday, I managed to get my cash within one hour soon after I applied without credit check and fax.
Here's a crazy idea ... By: heatbucspies55. on 27 Mar 12, 02:31:38 Here's a crazy idea, how about the people don't take out? those loans.
Payday lenders hunt ... By: elmagnificodep. on 20 Mar 12, 17:32:25 Payday lenders hunt broke people not minorities. It just happens that? minorities on average have less annual income than whites or Asians. That is why you won't see these places in rich neighborhoods. People that have money are too smart to fall for this. I'm debt free minus a mortgage. I can buy cars without a loan.
click on my channel ... By: 3zmoney. on 20 Mar 12, 15:16:10 click on my channel and make some extra cash its LEGIT real money to be made here. Avoid scams like most of these work from home jobs. earn $5 just for joining check it out.get paid to veiw ads get paid for surfing the internet get paid for surveys get paid for reading emails get paid for posting blogs get paid for reffering? get paid for doing offers and much much more 2 many 2 list the system does it all! the best thing its free! the real deal is here.click on my channel thank you
The debtor is a ... By: PunKarmus. on 06 Mar 12, 22:50:42 The debtor is a slave to the lender.?
one black guy and ... By: asumo82. on 01 Mar 12, 05:51:06 one black guy and the establishment isnt? white anymore, looool!
It's just? another ... By: Mrspeakerofthehouse2. on 17 Jan 12, 15:00:08 It's just? another form of loan sharking.
Interest on loans ... By: triumph209. on 11 Jan 12, 05:22:15 Interest on loans increase proportionally to risk. The riskier the loan, the higher the interest. I'm no fan of loansharking, but anyone who signs a contract while understanding the terms of the contract is responsible for his own? action.
450%= untrue... Ive ... By: ValiantATHLETE. on 25 Nov 11, 20:08:43 450%= untrue... Ive done payday loans it wasnt anywhere near that much interest
Agree its a way to make? more money by usary
It is worst then ... By: MrAppleseed88. on 31 Aug 11, 23:54:05 It is worst then this. Small business loans for minorities are a give away to big banks, because 95% of all small business fail in five years, meaning the banks get all the payments, and all the assets at the end of the business. And stupid liberal do? gooders pay for it all via huge taxes... Just feed the evil blood sucking banks all the money...
I'm a liberal and ... By: Partyffs. on 09 Aug 11, 08:17:03 I'm a liberal and i agree? whit you.
Conservatives see ... By: J5MARLON. on 08 Aug 11, 00:14:11 Conservatives see minorities as invaders that are hear to take away jobs from hardworking white Americans with cheap paying Mexicans and Affirmative Action. As if a hard working black is? the one with the most cotton not about being the right one for hire employment in a boss position. Both sides have their issues and this video shows that independent economics that conservatives love so much hurt minorities with bank scams and should gov be a referee for fairness is that "big gov?"
Nice tag, but swing ... By: xpandergt. on 07 Aug 11, 21:32:18 Nice tag, but swing and a miss.? I'm conservative in nature by registered independent. Try again.
and a republican. ? By: J5MARLON. on 06 Aug 11, 04:27:19 and a republican. ?
To liberals, ... By: xpandergt. on 04 Aug 11, 14:06:06 To liberals, minorities are nothing? more then helpless, pathetic people who will always need the liberals protection and help, because they can't fend for themselves. This is coming from a black person also.
I hate liberals, I ... By: Tsugua21. on 26 Jul 11, 22:29:27 I hate liberals, I really hate liberals they never hold women or minorities accountable. These people are responsible for the own actions and should manage their money better. As a BLACK man i manage my money well and have decent credit and i stay away from these PayDay loans. Nobodies is forcing these people to take out a payday loan. LIBERAL LOGIC: MAN SHOTS HIMSELF IN THE FOOT (ON PURPOSE),? SUE GUN MANUFACTURE.
no? way, I totally ... By: HKTeeVee. on 18 Jul 11, 07:16:26 no? way, I totally didn't know that! /sarcasm
there's a reason ... By: manonthemount. on 18 Jul 11, 03:46:22 there's a reason these establishments are? illegal in the rest of the industrialized world...
who are ... By: manonthemount. on 18 Jul 11, 03:45:29 who are disproportionately minorities....?
Video duration: 572 seconds
Global video hits: 1747
Legislative Analyst Mac Taylor discusses the basic composition of California's state budget. This includes a description of revenue sources, the general fund vs. special funds, and major categories of expenditure.
Video duration: 630 seconds
Global video hits: 3098
After more than three months of work, the congressional panel charged with finding ways to cut the nation\'s budget deficit seems to be stuck in neutral. Judy Woodruff discusses the deadlock with super committee member Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.
Video duration: 633 seconds
Global video hits: 3910
Ana Kasparian speaks with University of Colorado law professor Paul Campos about this controversial article where he argued that less than half of law school graduates find full time work as lawyers. Read the piece here: www.tnr.com
This guy has? guts. ... By: ripperduck. on 20 Mar 12, 06:21:39 This guy has? guts.....
--what are you ... By: sabdow. on 19 Feb 12, 06:30:22 --what are you interested in? why don't you watch youtube videos of introductory Economics subjects and they will gauge your interest. if youre fallign asleep or bored listening to them, then its not the thing for you.
and do the same with Finance or any other fields. i cant tell you what youre? going to like...
So what do you mean ... By: GollaGandaLova. on 13 Feb 12, 21:43:39 So what do you mean man?? I shouldn't get a degree in Econ at Uni? Cause I know learning economics is very handy and an efficient language to know...
-- yes its a great ... By: sabdow. on 14 Jan 12, 12:47:43 -- yes its a great degree but it is for? pansies. its a step in the right direction if you want to work in the financial world. i spent 4 years at uni learning in economics and finance about how efficient the market is, how you cant make money from it etc. and now im a futures trader.
uni is a different ball game. one you shouldnt play for too long.
Yes? i think ... By: GollaGandaLova. on 24 Dec 11, 06:04:28 Yes? i think economics is a great degree, u agree?
Economics is a ... By: GollaGandaLova. on 24 Dec 11, 06:00:55 Economics is a great college degree. Its got nothing to do with Political? Science, but if you have passion for solving the nations problems, solutions and what we can do to become energy independent, Economics is great. However it doesnt pay as much as an Engineering degree, average starting salary is $50 k and up. And Economists are great in demand nowdays.
LOL? I saw the same ... By: JenUsesInternet. on 16 Nov 11, 06:46:17 LOL? I saw the same commercial!
why spend bucks and ... By: rambolean. on 04 Nov 11, 16:35:31 why spend bucks and three? to four years in class, instead make money and progress your career, I am the proud and first drop out of my law school class, and took a position as a banker and I saw first hand lawyers, and only one was well off, even then nothing to brag about in comparison to doctor or stud business owners
There are lots and ... By: TripleAgent83. on 13 Sep 11, 07:48:48 There are lots and lots and lots and lots of people....Enough that they can be happy to choose? whatever they want to study or choose as a career.....Sociology, the (soft science), studies ALL of the lots and lots and lots and lots of people out there. It takes a Sociologist, a good one, to run an effective economy.
Before the video ... By: TripleAgent83. on 13 Sep 11, 07:43:18 Before the video there was a commercial about lean and mean dog food, and you see some athletic guy jump in the pool and barely? see the dog! lol.
It should be noted ... By: JoblessJane. on 09 Sep 11, 07:37:16 It should be noted that the economy can only employ so many doctors, engineers, and medical researchers at currently prevailing wage rates and that if we were to double the number of engineers, the number of jobs for engineers would not magically increase to accommodate them. Many engineers might also argue that the engineering field is also glutted. We already have far too many PhD. scientists. Search for an article? titled The Real Science Gap in Miller-McCune.
Whatever you do, do ... By: JoblessJane. on 09 Sep 11, 07:24:00 Whatever you do, do NOT go to law school because it is a severely over-glutted field and the majority of new JDs will not find legitimate? jobs in the legal profession. If you are seriously considering law school, you owe it to? yourself to conduct large amounts of research before you ruin your life with huge amounts of student loan debt. Seek out the law school scambusting blogs such as the ones at Blogspot: JDScam, FlusterCucked, LawSchoolScam and search for the JD Underground discussion forum.
The stupidity is? ... By: braydenbeautiful. on 19 Aug 11, 19:02:32 The stupidity is? really just incredible.
The engine for ... By: braydenbeautiful. on 15 Aug 11, 22:38:02 The engine for economic growth has always been science, at? least from the industrial revolution onward. I don't dislike the arts or social sciences; I'm a chemistry major, as I said, and I take 4000 level english lit classes. Orwell and Arthur Miller make my toes curl -- so this is not coming from hate. The problem is the jobs of the future are high tech...high math/science jobs.There will always be arts jobs, but you can expect them to shrink even more in the coming decades.
...Don't take it ... By: NikoLiberty1000. on 15 Aug 11, 22:29:25 ...Don't take it personally, but just try to understand this from the viewpoint of somebody who has a passion for working in law? or social/ political sciences.
I agree that ... By: NikoLiberty1000. on 15 Aug 11, 22:27:17 I agree that science is an under appreciated field and that we definitely need more scientists, I just feel that just because there? is a need for scientists & doctors, doesn't necessarily mean that people should be obligated to fill those jobs. I mean what if in 25 years we end up having a need for people to work in fields involving social & political sciences again?...
Uhh, I don't recall ... By: braydenbeautiful. on 15 Aug 11, 18:40:36 Uhh, I don't recall trying to stop you from doing whatever banal job you? want.
Here's an idea: ... By: NikoLiberty1000. on 15 Aug 11, 15:03:01 Here's an idea: let? me do what job I want to damn do, even if it involves social science.
We'll just have to ... By: braydenbeautiful. on 14 Aug 11, 03:50:16 We'll just have to agree to? disagree on everything you just said.
No hard feelings.
yeah, but there's ... By: stfuxcali. on 14 Aug 11, 03:48:50 yeah, but there's so many people going into the medical field so i wouldn't worry too much about it. i mean, this isn't China, haha, people should be able to comfortably pick the job they want and love without feeling guilty for? potentially slowing down the U.S's science advancements
fair enough, just ... By: braydenbeautiful. on 13 Aug 11, 21:30:28 fair enough, just as long as? you're not surprised when the US loses the title of world's largest economy, or when drugs come out 10 years later than they could have under ideal circumstances (i.e., more science people).
true.. but people ... By: stfuxcali. on 13 Aug 11, 21:28:09 true.. but people are going to do what they like because it's what'll make them happy.. you have to WANT to be a doctor, and honestly, I'd rather be a high school ? teacher living in an apartment and loving my job rather than being something that I would hate to do just because we apparently "need more" people doing these jobs, such a doctor, engineer or medical researcher.
Because? math here ... By: SapphireDiamond19. on 07 Aug 11, 00:29:52 Because? math here is terrible. The math currciculm here is the worst in the world and math teachers here are terrible. Sorry
It's great when ... By: foggymedia. on 26 Jul 11, 09:40:38 It's great when people stick there necks at least a bit. We? need a softcore Wikileaks for people to step out like this.
Stop blaming ... By: krissthewarrior. on 14 Apr 12, 06:48:52 Stop blaming Mexicans for what you'r countries and my Continental Europe's united bankers front did! This is there fault and not HARD working Mexican fault in the USA? (except Mexicans who are criminals and so on)!
HOW WE GONNA? ... By: sarcasticoldbastard. on 10 Jan 12, 07:11:40 HOW WE GONNA? SUPPORT ALL OF OBAMAS MEXICANS WITHOUT TAXES , IF HE SPENT HALF AS MUCH TIME WORRYING ABOUT THIS COUNTRY
Its amazing how far ... By: mikedd56. on 09 Sep 10, 04:28:06 Its amazing how far ppl can actually get there head up there ass. Hey Douche it was liberal special interest groups like accorn forcing banks to give loans & houses to ppl who couldnt afford it & corrupt institutions like Fannie May b/c liberals repeatedly assure concerned republicans that? there was nothing to worry about that ruined the economy. And Obama spent a trillion dollars on apparently nothing he didnt create shit the economy is worse off & now he wants to spend more
Hes not reffering ... By: LightJehuety. on 29 Aug 10, 07:47:19 Hes not reffering to republican voters hes reffering to republican politicians who want tax cuts.?
why doesn't this ... By: EvermontKing. on 14 Aug 10, 08:27:21 why doesn't this fuckhead talk about the real issue.. Obama and Bush are pretty? much the same and are only puppets for the federal reserve owners and social elite. I hate this guy and if I ever see him I'm going to hit him in the face with a slushy. Fuck the young turks. Dumb ass haters.
Well, you're right ... By: Hakudohshi. on 12 Jul 10, 02:13:53 Well, you're right to a point, it's just that part of what caused? the recession is letting the free market do whatever it wants, I personally think that a meld of increased market regulation, less tax cuts and stimulus spending, and more business incentives to create jobs like Obama has already been doing, and good common sense is a pretty good combination of goals to put the economy back on track.
You dumb asses. ... By: dirtyshortsPU. on 24 Jan 10, 06:02:30 You dumb asses. Obamateur allowed Bush tax cuts across the board to expire this year. The 10% bracket will rise to 15% again. And you think this Kenyan is giving you a tax cut? You? people are very stupid.
Republicans think ... By: TheAntichristHoax. on 02 Oct 09, 15:01:03 Republicans think all US Resources belong exclusively TO THEM!
If something benefits the majority of Americans ... they call it SOCIALISM,? WELFARE, etc, etc, etc.
Love how this ... By: oxomaticman. on 15 Sep 09, 13:07:32 Love how this dumbass refers to anyone who votes republican as an idiot,as if any and everyone who votes democrat down the line has a better grasp on all that is life and politics. This jackass should take his mic and camera to the streets of? detroit, san francisco, LA, and DC to discuss economics in the US, how,when and why the government should get involved, etc....then ask them how they voted. I'm sure most of the footage would end up on the cutting room floor.
So we just blame ... By: christo930. on 03 Aug 09, 21:33:32 So we just blame republicans even when the democrats do something stupid? Oh, this is? great
This is as ... By: TheLegalImmigrant05. on 03 Aug 09, 21:02:00 This is as ridiculous piece of economic analysis as I have heard in a long time
Epic? Fail
LOL
On the MONEY!! ... By: TheLegalImmigrant05. on 03 Aug 09, 20:58:06 LOL
On the MONEY!!!?
How do you give an ... By: mg5679. on 15 Jul 09, 22:26:21 How do you give an income tax cut to people who don't pay? income tax?
The top 1% pay 40% of all the taxes. You add the top 5% pay over 50% of the taxes. The top 50% pay over 90 percent of all the taxes. The top 50% ranges from the billonare from the guy working in a factory
I wish I had a tax ... By: mainestategop. on 13 Jul 09, 19:12:53 I wish I had a tax cut.
We have morons in the GOP who give tax cuts to CEOS that outsource jobs and bring in immigrants that take the few jobs left and then we have liberals that want to soak everyone, then give rebates to crack addicts in housing projects and rescue missions that don't work and don't even want? to work.
That's just it, ... By: thekingmaker10. on 09 Jul 09, 20:16:02 That's just it, Republicans don't want to "give" anything to the "big" guys, they just want to not "take" as much. You and I have no right to say wether or not someone "earned" their money.
Look, there are a FEW poor people who are incapable of earning a good living, and there are a FEW people who get lucky by being born into a rich family or winning the lottery or something. However, MOST rich people got rich from many? years of hard work, and MOST poor people are poor because they are lazy.
You put it like ... By: upplsuckimcool16. on 07 Jul 09, 07:46:04 You put it like that is wrong. You say people who earn it and people who don't. NO It is people who make more than other people giving to the less off. AND the people that are UNABLE to earn it,
IT ISN'T PRETTY SIMPLE!!! Simple mind come up with simple solutions. Listen? the big guys who make a lot of money are just as important as the little guy that builds his office. Everyone has a role and it isn't fair to do what the republicans want and only give credit to the big guy!
There is no such ... By: thekingmaker10. on 15 Jun 09, 14:37:33 There is no such thing as infallible statistical data on? these matters, but we have to use the best data available. The data I use comes from the IRS, the US census bereau, and exit polling, which again, is flawed, but is the best data available. Also, I am sure there are some right wing trust fund babies included, but they would't be part of the 53% supporting Obama now would they?
Well now, that's a ... By: Proudtobeacommie. on 12 Jun 09, 23:28:42 Well now, that's a bit hypocritical. How may right wing trust fund babies are? there?
And how do you figure out that percentage?
Based on the fact ... By: thekingmaker10. on 05 May 09, 16:32:03 Based on the fact that about 40% of American families now pay ZERO federal income taxes, and another 10 - 15% are upper-crust white liberal trust-fund babies who have everything handed to them and don't have to really earn it, it isn't hard to see how Obama got 53% of the vote. You have people voting to take money from people who earn it and give it to? people who don't. It is really pretty simple.
No matter what the ... By: BattleBeast81imback. on 03 May 09, 06:01:27 No matter what the polls say, Obama and his voters are the laughing stock? of the nation.
Green does not help ... By: scata99. on 10 Mar 09, 19:24:29 Green does not help the economy because the rate of return? of energy is very low in relation to the costs.
Stock market has ... By: flyboymd82. on 03 Mar 09, 04:06:02 Stock market has lost half its value in the 4 months SINCE B.O. got elected. Lowest point in 13 years.
9000 earmarks in the new spending bill. B.O. PROMISED to end "corrupt earmarks".
Obama promised not to appoint lobbyists to anything. He appointed lobbyists.
Obama has appointed 5 tax evaders to high positions, one to run the IRS!
Obama plans to take our gun? rights away and our free speech rights away.
Obama is gonna tax the shit out of us.
So much for "hope" & "change".
MORONS!
The Best of ... By: TruthBehindComedy. on 01 Mar 09, 15:40:26 The Best of Republican "leaders:" Bobby Jindal, John McCain, George W.Bush (RnC nominee twice, mind you) and Sarah Palin. Out of the entire RnC, these are the best. Let me repeat, several hundred prospectual republican? leaders, and these are the people they submit as their best. God, if a republican ever gets elected as president again, we're in trouble. The RnC is like an incompetent broker telling you to buy stock in Milli Vanilli 8 track tapes.
and in 2010, we ... By: reddoogan. on 15 Feb 09, 04:33:59 and in 2010, we only get $7.70 extra a week in our paychecks...so much for stimulating the economy. People are going to start saving their money instead of spending it and the economy is really going to tank when businesses can't stay open because we are not spending. Then it's going to affect the commercial real estate market. Button down the hatches people we are in for a rough? ride for the next few years...
Actually, you are ... By: blur880. on 13 Feb 09, 18:34:48 Actually, you are totally wrong. Bush did a lot of things wrong, but it was hardly the slowest rebound. I don't even know what "since before WWII means." Do you mean "before" or "since?" Using them both just muddles everything.
And, it was hardly? just the rich. My mutual funds fell quickly after 9/11, but they had more than recovered by last fall. Wallstreet did very well during most of Bush's reign.
Video duration: 438 seconds
Global video hits: 21027
Cenk Uygur (host of The Young Turks) filling in for Dylan Ratigan on MSNBC talks to Rep. Robert Andrews (D-NJ) about politicians fighting to extend the Bush tax cuts for the rich, some of which are within the Democratic Party despite president Obama coming out against an extension.
WHY would the ... By: 271207. on 24 May 12, 19:58:06 WHY would the insanely rich get tax cuts? They have so much money they don't know what to do with it so they buy fourteen sportcars, three beachhouses and/or and a private? island. What's wrong with having only thirteen sportcars, two beachhouses and/or a peninsula?
Here, we have a saying: The strongest shoulders carry the heaviest loads. That is why the more you earn, the more taxes you pay. Above a certain paygrade the rate is 52%, like my dad and trust me, growing up, we did not go hungry...
i wonder if obama ... By: conkal9. on 16 Apr 12, 22:08:11 i wonder if obama will have another las vegas party.
Lavish government seminar costs taxpayers $800,000
Read more from this in Tulsa World .com?
Man you people are ... By: conkal9. on 16 Apr 12, 01:49:36 Man you people are so so stupid. Obama has? racked up so much debt, you will be giving your entire check to pay off his debt! It will really hurt the poor.
if theres a way to ... By: shino475. on 25 Feb 12, 02:28:46 if theres a way to make the economy better? why would people be against it wouldnt it help everyone?
I own three? mac's ... By: MOXWELLDIAMOND. on 30 Aug 11, 00:18:22 I own three? mac's and I have two iphones, now suck my independent dick.
Both sides have ... By: HypnoToad72. on 30 Aug 11, 00:12:27 Both sides have plenty? of sellouts. Can't get more simple than that...
- buy a computer ... By: HypnoToad72. on 30 Aug 11, 00:10:09 - buy a computer that is capable of using lower-case letters. Yelling like a toddler won't get you anywhere.? Ditto for your draconian use of language.
"Our true choice is ... By: BlackRepublican2010. on 18 Jul 11, 03:09:18 "Our true choice is not between tax reduction, on the one? hand & the avoidance of large Federal deficits on the other. An economy hampered by restrictive tax rates will never produce enough revenues to balance our budget just as it will never produce enough jobs or enough profits. It is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high today & tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now."President John F Kennedy
Democrats arn't ... By: TanzanianRoots. on 14 Jul 11, 02:09:45 Democrats arn't pussies. If the republicans bad together and say no, your just? fucked.
It is clear? the ... By: MrAppleseed88. on 17 Jun 11, 12:05:12 It is clear? the rich and corporations have no concern for us or our nation. we need to nationalize all industry and put the people to work. All profit goes to the people first, then the state, and then the corporation.
: You're right, ... By: AClRCLEOFLlGHT. on 21 May 11, 15:00:15 : You're right, people have welcomed the removal of their freedom for the illusion of security. By allowing the first infringements, it created a "no end in sight" situation. We cannot pick and choose (this or that) because all exceptions will reopen the no end in sight situation. We have to be true to the constitution without exception. If anything,? healthcare choices should be given to states, but never the federal government.
: The federal ... By: AClRCLEOFLlGHT. on 21 May 11, 14:55:46 : The federal government has no right to infringe upon the free choice? rights of any individual. Did you know that within the United States, a doctor is only allowed to give 1 of 3 cancer treatments. Chemotherapy, perscription medication, and surgery. There are treatments which are proven to work far better, which are used in other countries, but because they're not approved by the FDA, americans can't have them. That's federal infringement for you and it needs to end completely.
A couple of other ... By: Relbl. on 21 May 11, 14:52:38 A couple of other points: the constitution? originally had 10 points, but has had 19(?) amendments - it's not immutable and should be reexamined to see how it holds up to modern times. I'll debate this b/c our two economies are so intertwined that if America crashes and burns again I don't think we can absorb the shock this time. Also, the cultural tsunami that is American media is in a unique position (due to proximity and language) to influence our debate; reversal is fair-play
Personally, I don't ... By: Relbl. on 21 May 11, 14:42:17 Personally, I don't even understand the logic of the unconstitutionality of a nationalized healthcare plan? - the concept didn't even exist in the 1780s. Maybe I can agree that what you have now is iffy because it's not a single payer system rather a plan that forces one to purchase insurance. Regardless, the argument is spurious because privacy is also mandated in the constitution and no one gives a shit that they have none anymore (in the name of security - what a joke!)
: The america I ... By: AClRCLEOFLlGHT. on 21 May 11, 06:25:38 : The america I want to live in is one that is run by the constitution, not one where it's exempt in certain situations. Nationalized healthcare is unconstitutional, its been debated time and? time again. When I have to choose between the "US Constitution" or "saving buckets of money", I go with the constitution. But I can see where you'd have trouble making such a choice. If you don't mind me asking, why are you even in this conversation if you're a Canuck?
Providing health ... By: Relbl. on 20 May 11, 21:02:09 Providing health benefits, paying retirees (which small business does that?), matching payroll tax - those are all cost of labour; none of those are the federal income tax that's in question here. I do run a small business in Canada (my homeland) and do quite well ty. Of? all the labour costs you mention, health benefits are surely the biggest expense, and conservatives (assuming you are) are rabidly opposed to a nationalized system that would save your business buckets of money
: Taxation is a ... By: AClRCLEOFLlGHT. on 20 May 11, 16:39:30 : Taxation is a big part of labor costs. Providing health benefits, paying retirees, worker's compensation, not to mention that employers pay taxes on top of their employees payroll taxes. To hire americans in america pretty much causes double taxation on almost everything. If you ever ran a business of your own, you'd understand. Its very easy to be on your end and argue when all you have are unexperienced assumptions. ? Like "taxation myth". Nice one.
The role of govt is ... By: Relbl. on 20 May 11, 15:58:10 The role of govt is to direct the conduct of business, and the majority of people scream for the govt to force job creation - though they probably prefer the carrot to the stick. I agree that 95% of new jobs are being outsourced, but not b/c of taxation rather it's cost of labour. If profit motive wasn't a? factor (via higher tax rates) then re-investment in business would follow and labour might return to America. The taxation myth is a canard at best, an outright lie otherwise.
: "Enforce"? It ... By: AClRCLEOFLlGHT. on 20 May 11, 06:37:12 : "Enforce"? It sounds like? you're advocating for the government to step into businesses and decide what, and how many new jobs they create. Hell no. We can squabble about taxes all day, but the real issue is outsourcing. Look at the number of jobs outsourced to china and other countries since the recession, and compare than with the unemployment rate. There's your jobs! Raise taxes on business... lose more jobs! We need those jobs back.
It's not punishment ... By: Relbl. on 19 May 11, 21:32:36 It's not punishment! Basically, the argument is that the rich will spend their own money to provide jobs, ie finance the lower classes, if only the taxes were lower? So why should it be such a big shift in thinking to let the? govt to enforce that by taking that 3% of income (only above a certain level) as tax and creating those jobs/services? I guess what I'm saying is that the rich people who use this excuse should put their money where their mouth is or stop using the argument
: I'll forgive the ... By: AClRCLEOFLlGHT. on 19 May 11, 19:05:46 : I'll forgive the 2% difference 99%/97%, since its the rich that provide the most jobs in this country. The other thing is that you make it sound like middle class families have to scrape a living. No, they're just forced not to live on credit, and only purchase what their incomes can afford. Ergo: a family of 3 is having a difficult time? paying for their 5 bedroom house.
You can't punish wealthy people for being successful.
The NATO mission in ... By: Relbl. on 19 May 11, 17:15:52 The NATO mission in Libya is not led by America, and that strike was not carrying out by American forces. That being said,? I think it's wrong that NATO should be making assassination strikes against Ghad'afi - even if he is a giant turd, he's still a world leader and that kind of conduct against leaders is immoral... that's where the whole idea of diplomatic immunity comes from; no govt should target to kill govt officials even if they are corrupt and committing loathesome acts
Here are some other ... By: Relbl. on 19 May 11, 17:10:28 Here are some other Facts: the top 2% earn 99% of the income so even paying 97% of fed income tax isn't balanced; Fact: fed income tax accounts for 55% of fed tax revenues, the other 45% are corp and consumption taxes; Fact: maybe 'fair share' shouldn't be used, but a middle class or low income family? that has to spend every dime they make to stay afloat has MUCH LESS ability to cope with higher taxes than someone making millions of dollars that they couldn't spend in a lifetime.
Brilliant videos.? ... By: gv1256. on 25 May 12, 16:04:26 Brilliant videos.? Thanks for sharing knowledge.
The problem is that ... By: UmTheMuse. on 14 May 12, 21:36:10 The problem is that the consumables are sunk into inefficient allocations and can't (easily) be reallocated. People bought consumer goods with the idea that they were *investing*.
Yes, the construction workers et al? made money, but it's only transferred money, not an actual increase in people's well-being. An equal amount of money got thrown out the window when the house was foreclosed, btw.
why did last video ... By: Dmi3Animation. on 14 May 12, 19:44:43 why did last video was removed? it sounds like the most important part of playlist. Mr. Khan, were you threatened for the content with solution out of this? mess?
No the? banks ... By: Empty Buckets. on 12 May 12, 06:47:18 No the? banks didn't lose but the depositors did and so did all the 401ks and pension funds that bought the toxic debts.
Gays check out how? ... By: nokkont. on 19 Apr 12, 19:32:24 Gays check out how? to become popular Russian invention
/watch?v=Y-pztzYMasA&feature=g-upl&context=G2f02875AUAAAAAAAAAA
The bank did not? ... By: Apsolutni. on 28 Mar 12, 13:32:06 The bank did not? loose anything. The 500k issued as loans were most likely created out of thin air and backed by nothing. So the banks didn't really loose anything, as they usually never do.
FUCKING GRANITE? ... By: D4rkJOKER1. on 28 Feb 12, 02:25:14 FUCKING GRANITE? COUNTERTOPS! THE BANE OF OUR EXISTANCE!
You might also add ... By: ivanjrt. on 14 Feb 12, 15:03:25 You might also add the fact that the givernment played a very important role in creating this unjustified apreciation in prices. Businesses have to compete against each other to stay profitable, the gov created insentives that were not in place before and caused banks to take change their way of? lending.
Sal, you need to ... By: OnlyWay93. on 28 Dec 11, 03:55:21 Sal, you need to endorse Ron Paul!?
So? the lesson is ... By: abvmoose87. on 02 Dec 11, 15:30:46 So? the lesson is don't take home equity loans?
He learned this? ... By: PunjabiSikhRajput1. on 25 Oct 11, 20:39:16 He learned this? from Peter Schiff
its not like money ... By: tIs4gatorbait. on 14 Jul 11, 02:41:11 its not like money spent on consumables is thrown into an incinerator, it goes to those providing the good/service who? then in turn spend it on something and so on. in all likelihood it is invested at some point. ive so far failed to see the problem
I thought I was the ... By: tIs4gatorbait. on 14 Jul 11, 02:26:17 I thought I was the only one. The audio is messed up? a bit
It goes to the ... By: mjaeger311. on 22 Jun 11, 02:33:32 It goes to the service economy. It does not go towards production of anything, rather it goes to a contractor who is probably getting rich in these boom cycles. That's fine, that's capitalism, but Sal is saying that 500k loan would have been better utilized by a new medical startup company that would? employ people for example. I'm pretty sure that new countertops do not boost GDP numbers.
Like Peter Schiff ... By: mjaeger311. on 22 Jun 11, 02:28:22 Like Peter Schiff says, once China? realizes they don't have to make our crap anymore and turn their production inwards towards their own consumption, China will be the new global superpower and frankly won't need the USA for anything.
Awesome assessment ... By: mjaeger311. on 22 Jun 11, 02:24:28 Awesome assessment and good points re:? government. You must be a Ron Paul fan!
did no one notice ... By: evilsidd. on 13 Jun 11, 04:42:24 did no one notice him going through puberty between 2.20 - 2.30?
yeah we know we ... By: frother. on 30 Mar 11, 01:56:18 yeah we know we just watched the video
this isnt a review box?
How was exactly the ... By: MrBipBipp. on 29 Mar 11, 22:23:34 How was exactly the wealth destroyed? When using lent money to go on? vacations or to "improve" your house, it goes to whoever sold you those goods and services o.0 Did I miss something?
Why don't we just ... By: FortNikitaBullion. on 18 Mar 11, 07:23:57 Why don't we just make people liable for their poor decisions, let them? pay back what they're underwater by. No bailouts, no moral hazard, and people will wake up overnight and stop taking ungodly risks.
Mind? blowing. By: degauze. on 12 Mar 11, 03:25:48 Mind? blowing.
Plain and simple: ... By: tekcuriousjoe. on 17 Feb 11, 00:52:17 Plain and simple: GREED, GREED and GREED.
It's part of the capitalism, everything goes up must eventually comes down.
If one failure to identify when is the peak or over value, will pay the price.
Gov't shouldn't step in bail them out. They deserve? it.
I? attribute this ... By: llarose. on 05 Feb 11, 07:15:56 I? attribute this problem mostly to the baby-boomer attitude.
So what went wrong ... By: D4niZeDog. on 17 Dec 10, 20:37:43 So what went wrong here? I don't have the answer, but I think people are very busy trying to point out who is responsible (though i reckon it should be done), or to say that the "system" is wrong and will lead us all to an unavoidable and painful end. But I think few people try to make? this system work correctly (like you would learn to drive a car). So thanks again for explaining these mechanics.
Video duration: 454 seconds
Global video hits: 22266
Cenk Uygur explains how taxes were actually much higher under president Ronald Reagan compared to today under president Barack Obama. On Facebook: www.facebook.com Subscribe: bit.ly TYT Mobile: bit.ly On Twitter: twitter.com www.theyoungturks.co m FREE Movies(!): www.netflix.com Read Ana's blog and subscribe at: www.examiner.com Read Cenk's Blog: www.huffingtonpost.c om
Cenk, it's not ... By: jcvjcvjcvjcv. on 24 Mar 12, 19:06:15 Cenk, it's not about the taxing, but the spending. The cost of government is in what it spends, not? in what it taxed. The differen [deficit] is either sucked out of the capital market or printed [inflation tax]
CAPITALISM creates ... By: koppellhinex. on 07 Mar 12, 04:44:58 CAPITALISM creates ELITE CRIMINALS. BANKERS. DRUG LORDS. INEQUALITY. INSECURITY. GREED. RUTHLESS COMMUNISM. NWO. NAZI. TERRORISM. LAZY PEOPLE. REBEL POLITICIAN. ANARCHY. worst is WAR etc. etc.. ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
CAPITALISM was designed only for CORRUPT OPPORTUNISTIC MANIPULATIVE LAZY POLITICIAN. BANKERS. LAWYERS. DRUG LORDS. JUDGES. CRIMINALS. DICTATORS. RULERS. KING. SULTANATE. EMPEROR etc..
HARD WORKING PEACE LOVING HAPPY HONEST SOCIETY were always the? slave victim and poorly starve to death. :(
I agree we need to ... By: 4yourinformationhaha. on 16 Feb 12, 05:11:34 I agree we need to get our spending under control, but we also need to get our revenues at an acceptable level too. I believe in balance. Despite right-wing rhetoric even Reagan wasn't opposed to this. I just watched a video of Obama and Reagan discussing raising taxes on the rich. If I didn't know any? better I could have sworn Reagan had taken possession of Obama's mind? and body during this clip.
Yet they never accused Reagan of class warfare
You tube: /watch?v=cgbJ-Fs1ikA
Also, due to ... By: groam6666. on 16 Feb 12, 02:34:14 Also, due to inflation taxes have to be lowered to prevent people from moving into higher tax brackets, even though their income stayed the same. It's why the percentage of total govt revenue has stayed near 32% to gdp in the last 40? years, even though taxes have been lowered.
It's really about preference more than anything else. I prefer large long term growth, over immediate gains. How is what I've said false, unrealistic, and romantic idealism?
Well, taxes are a ... By: groam6666. on 16 Feb 12, 01:54:35 Well, taxes are a big concern when it damages gdp growth, while the population is rapidly growing, but that's not the only concern (I know we pay lower? taxes today, I made that point in my first post here). The "crowding out" affect is the most detrimental. There have been a number of studies that have looked into this, and as it turns out, countries with lower spending and taxes to gdp, have very high economic growth.
You wrote "So, ... By: 4yourinformationhaha. on 15 Feb 12, 22:57:05 You wrote "So, Obama is great because he somehow inherited lower taxes?"
You're missing the point. Republicans like to run around screaming that Obama is TAXING? us to death, and oh how we miss the days of Ronald Reagan and his low taxes. However the actual statistics suggest we pay lower taxes now than we did in the 80's.
Conservatives positions are based in mostly false, unrealistic, romantic, idealism; while liberal's position are based in reality..
@Zachary Well then ... By: Loejyrrab. on 08 Jan 12, 16:10:36 @Zachary Well then, what did he say that was? false? Enlighten us.
Reagan began the ... By: Loejyrrab. on 07 Jan 12, 10:15:50 Reagan began the era of deficit spending. His OWN budgets had huge deficits.Massive across the board tax cuts=massive deficits. The Bush tax cuts? Again,huge deficits. It's not rocket science. Wealth redist? Merely a slogan. We have def's cause Bush put 2 phony wars ON CREDIT CARDS. Tax cuts and drug prog's also on credit. Our? kids&grandkids will have to pay those debts. Tech boom? Sure it helped, but Clinton also cut taxes correctly,on the mid.class. He cut welfare too.He did well!
Interesting, your ... By: groam6666. on 07 Jan 12, 06:41:02 Interesting, your correct about Regan deficits, but that also means that? lower taxes increase GDP growth and employment. We wouldn't have a deficit if the federal govt stopped their wealth redistribution programs. The states can handle that much more efficiently than the federal govt.
Clinton raised taxes and expanded the federal govt, but govt spending to GDP decreased, why? The states began cutting their taxes. You also should consider the tech boom and .com bubble.
Yes, there's been a ... By: Loejyrrab. on 07 Jan 12, 06:07:33 Yes, there's been a "large movement to lower taxes"? The result? massive new deficits. Reagan nearly tripled the national debt in 8yrs, Clinton, conversely, didn't add a dime to the debt in his 8yrs. In fact, he produced a surplus. Then comes Bush who blew the debt from 5 to 11 tril. What is the lesson? Republicans, for all their talk of competency, can't handle money. In fact, they are totally inept at governing. They should be forcefully disbanded and jailed for criminal negligence.
Would you please re ... By: Loejyrrab. on 07 Jan 12, 06:00:56 Would you please re-read your post. Tell me, what are you? saying.
your right the ... By: GrandAmGT1990. on 17 Dec 11, 18:34:47 your right the economy was different in the 80s and yes Reagan did lower taxes its just the tax rates was higher in the 80 and its lower to day and Obama is trying to raise the so you are so right we need more? people like you that under stand
The stimulus wasn't ... By: AliceNchainz011. on 01 Dec 11, 02:23:50 The stimulus wasn't big enough and it seemed to be geared more towards relief and not job creation. Germany tried a similar strategy and? they're doing well now..
This doesn't make ... By: groam6666. on 28 Oct 11, 15:57:23 This doesn't make sense. Regan fought to lower taxes, and he did. If your going to compare Regan with Obama, why not compare Regan with FDR? Ummm, of course taxes and tariffs were higher 40 years ago, they were even? higher 50,60 or 70 years ago. There's been a large movement to lower taxes.
So, Obama is great because he somehow inherited lower taxes?
the GOP? never let ... By: xxcrossed. on 17 Oct 11, 10:59:52 the GOP? never let a little thing like the truth get in the way ! Reagan could not get elected to day !
Oh never mind Cenk ... By: BioHunter1990. on 07 Oct 11, 06:08:44 Oh never mind Cenk Uygur being an absolute idiot...that's? all thank you.
Truth in higher taxes or not, never listen to deliberate idiots.
More liberal ... By: ramairluvr. on 28 Sep 11, 04:47:06 More liberal bullshit. ? Want to see what this line of thinking leads to? Look at our unemployment rate, failing investment infrastructure and all the lies (failed stimulus, failed health care, etc.) barack has laid onto the American public. Life was great under Reagan; most can't wait until obama is defeated. Another great story by the half wits at young jerks...uh, turks. Great reporting, Cenk....
the rich already ... By: Motorman0297. on 27 Sep 11, 23:42:57 the rich already pay 80% more taxes then the poor. So i? dont understand why we taxe them even more. Hurting the rich whit hurt the poor because they are the one who supply jobs to the lowerclass. Yeah we can taxe them.... but more people will be laid off believe it or not.
the poor don't ... By: jondoe91941. on 22 Sep 11, 03:00:26 the poor don't even? pay taxes typically, why do you think you get money back that you didn't pay in.. The most recent studies showed the poor pay -3.2% of the overall taxes taken in by the federal government.
Almost forgot, ... By: jondoe91941. on 22 Sep 11, 02:59:28 Almost forgot, Another difference with Regan vs Obama and taxes? Regan's tax increases were? to pay down the deficit, Obama's are to fund more "stimulus" aka wasteful spending/slush fund..
Maybe Reagan should ... By: jondoe91941. on 22 Sep 11, 02:56:18 Maybe Reagan should have just blamed all of the problems in the U.S. on Carter, It works for? Obama blaming Bush..
The difference is ... By: jondoe91941. on 22 Sep 11, 02:55:30 The difference is when? you are building the economy more taxation is acceptable, when you are destroying the economy, more taxation is not acceptable. Beyond that, How many of these taxes were required to pay for crap that Carter put in place. Why is it the republicans always have to be the bad guys by footing the bill for the Democrats irresponsible spending?
tax the rich....the ... By: whyUspeakin. on 19 Sep 11, 23:05:56 tax the rich....the poor shouldnt be the ones who loose everything? to make others life easier!
Video duration: 961 seconds
Global video hits: 4551
Stefan Molyneux, Host of Freedomain Radio, reads Jeffrey Tucker's most excellent book "It's a Jetson's World" is now out on Mises.org :) Get the entire audiobook for free: mises.org You can paste the following feed url into your iTunes to get all the available segments at once: mises.org
Stefbot gives you? ... By: spystyle. on 24 Jan 12, 22:04:14 Stefbot gives you? a big truth pill in every episode. If it hurts to swallow, don't worry, the effect of truth is wonderful after it's swallowed :)
Wow... I love this. ... By: kidequinox. on 23 Jan 12, 12:04:16 Wow... I love this. Thanks guys?
With an open mind ... By: annewilken. on 05 Jan 12, 16:36:14 With an open mind listened in its entirety, twice. Thumbs up. True I am quick to respond, part way through at times. In hind site...it for (me) has earned my positive critique with whatever gem made me want to post or thumbs up at that moment. Something I hadn't thought about. Thx.? Also I can always comment or explain after the thumbs up or add. Was doing it mindlessly.
Please don't thumbs ... By: NativeNewMexican. on 03 Jan 12, 05:10:43 Please don't thumbs up or down without having seen at least a sample of a video. I know with stef it's likely that you'll click it, basically a foregone conclusion, but? it's a bad precedent to act without knowing the reality. Sure, a thumbs up is no big deal, but so was the first 5 extra pounds I put on.
The only? nonsense ... By: XulChris. on 31 Dec 11, 18:36:57 The only? nonsense is coming from you.
i.imgur. com/4FDi7.jpg
The Mises Institute ... By: MrAdvancedAtheist. on 31 Dec 11, 16:54:59 The Mises Institute website gives the ebook away for free if you hunt around for it. If the Mises Institute doesn't have price signals to tell it how many copies of the ebook to produce,? how can it do this without causing economic chaos?
What nonsense. ... By: MrAdvancedAtheist. on 31 Dec 11, 16:26:50 What nonsense. Seventh Day Adventists and other vegetarians eat grains and yet live longer and enjoy better health into old age than people who eat a lot of animal protein. Google about all the? Adventist health studies.
what do? u mean? By: fergus247. on 28 Dec 11, 14:31:26 what do? u mean?
is the book on ... By: xiz22. on 26 Dec 11, 15:38:18 is the book on youtube? somewhere?
Thanks? Stefan. ... By: tzankich. on 25 Dec 11, 18:00:28 Thanks? Stefan. I'm up to Chapter 8 now and the reading is excellent. (In the realm of audiobooks, I've never even been able to say until now that a reading was even competent.)
I don't like the ... By: XulChris. on 25 Dec 11, 04:15:32 I don't like the chapter on cereal. Grains are poison, and they will not be around for ever. Also I don't see the point of the chapter other than products last longer than a lifetime. But so what. Steak and eggs have been around for hundreds of lifetimes. So what if grains last that long too. But grains are a horrible example since grains are actually? poisonous and will not be around forever once people learn about the health implications of eating grains.
I like the chapter ... By: XulChris. on 24 Dec 11, 19:43:49 I like the chapter on geeks and wonks. I always wondered? what the difference was between the two.
The reason is this ... By: WEH1123. on 24 Dec 11, 09:45:48 The reason is this when you have bigger entities they are slower at adapting. ? They have all that mass in staff and property and contracts that will slow them down. I seen things about Hollywood in fear of the internet entertainment or AAA games losing to some online web games or Wallmart losing out to small companies from Amazon and eBay. It will be hard to have large entities as they just will not be able to adapt as fast. Empire will be ripped apart like planets nearing a black hole.
I have the thought ... By: WEH1123. on 24 Dec 11, 09:33:56 I have the thought that we are coming close to a technological singularity. This is perhaps one of the reason we are having a shift and strong? title forces in the social and economic world also because the governments are adding more thread of laws. It seems like we are getting closer and closer to the singularity. One thing I to hypothesis is when we get really close it will be almost impossible for big entities to hold together.
Continue
Strictly? speaking, ... By: Jouzou87. on 24 Dec 11, 00:34:31 Strictly? speaking, the little box allows you to talk with "anyone on the planet who owns a similar little box", but I get the point.
The clovers are ... By: Draginvry2. on 23 Dec 11, 06:53:16 The clovers are floating up, and the snowflakes are? floating down.
Capitalist ... By: capitalistsamurai. on 22 Dec 11, 20:36:55 Capitalist innovations and revolutions are perceived as "natural." So, when socialists/communists complain about capitalists taking things already present in the public ("common") "natural" wealth is absolutely nonsense. It was not the Oceanic Nazis "Sea Shepard" and Green Peace that ended the whaling in the United States! It was John D. Rockefeller's innovation on oil processing! Because of Rockefeller, making Whale oil past technology,? Sea Shepard can hypocritically condemn Japanese whaling!
That's great! Mr ... By: L1ber8ted. on 22 Dec 11, 12:59:04 That's great! Mr Tucker is an excellent writer. He makes things sound fun and interesting, no matter the preconceptions? of the topic.
Just listened to ... By: sharperguy. on 22 Dec 11, 08:26:21 Just listened to the first couple of chapters. Made me want to start a blog - somehow he summed up my thoughts exactly on the topic of? writing.
This is great, when ... By: aristochat3. on 22 Dec 11, 07:34:44 This is great, when is it? coming out on iTunes?
your totally ... By: Tethloach1. on 22 Dec 11, 03:42:44 your totally correct, also as humans why stop at technology like stef said. lets include everything biology stem cell research etcs. we should fill all fronts make our? lives better in every way possible did you hear of the cross breed of tree/ fire firefly in the future we should have the power to alter our genes to get certain traits= human 2.0
part 2
"I think ... By: Hashishin13. on 22 Dec 11, 02:38:44 part 2
"I think eventually we'll be forced into a resource based society. "
Go watch Stefan's critique of TZM or RBEs(the zeitgeist movement and resource based economies respectively. They are one and the same with communism, which failed miserably and killed over 100 million? of it's own citizens ion the process.
"useless junk we ... By: Hashishin13. on 22 Dec 11, 02:37:26 "useless junk we have shoved down our necks every 5 minutes? by the free market"
That is the stupidest thing I've read all day, if its useless junk why are you buying it? How is anything being "shoved down our necks"? If you don't like it don't buy it, nobody is forcing you moron.
"But most of the problems of today's? society comes from our need for useless junk"
Government taking half of all our income, bossing us around and throwing people in jail for growing plants?
Nor have? I felt ... By: TheBookArchive. on 22 Dec 11, 01:30:33 Nor have? I felt unthoughtfulness when donating.
Gays check? out how ... By: nokkont. on 19 Apr 12, 19:25:59 Gays check? out how to become popular Russian invention
/watch?v=Y-pztzYMasA&feature=g-upl&context=G2f02875AUAAAAAAAAAA
all? banks fail, ... By: CarlosMendoification. on 31 Mar 12, 01:52:10 all? banks fail,when one does.
excellent stuff ? By: omgiheartpie. on 25 Feb 12, 06:17:46 excellent stuff ?
Hats off to? u for ... By: kohlismunishk. on 22 Jul 11, 23:28:14 Hats off to? u for taking out time for such a valuable information in simple way.
Hm,? I don't agree By: flyingbeagles. on 05 Jun 11, 04:44:48 Hm,? I don't agree
You could go a ... By: k3nuot. on 28 Jan 11, 04:29:15 You could go a little bit faster, i think people that interested in these video already had some basic knowledge in finance, so you don't have to explain? so detail what is what. Overall, useful information and thanks for doing this.
Lehman Brothers was ... By: Chnamanjx. on 10 Jan 11, 22:52:33 Lehman Brothers was Mr. Smith.? The Financial System is the Matrix.
May bank A borrow a ... By: dalcde. on 06 Nov 10, 09:53:54 May bank A borrow a million from bank B (who owes A 1M) and say that "I will pay you back on the day you pay me back your loan. The interest is the amount of interest you have to pay me" and? make it "due" although it is not yet due?
Its getting more ... By: wmanger. on 16 Sep 10, 02:40:34 Its getting more interesting? here,learning the real economic crash is all about.It reminds me the TSUNAMI..
does somethig ... By: tosomya. on 11 Apr 10, 18:49:55 does somethig similiar in paper? document form exist, please?
thank you for ... By: mashhype. on 22 Dec 09, 06:06:44 thank you for breaking down? a complex topic into manageable parts!!!
super cool.? don't ... By: bharati1986. on 07 Sep 09, 21:51:52 super cool.? don't think any other source online comes even remotely close to explaining stuff this well. better than any of my uni lectures..brilliant!
I really hope more ... By: kurktchian123. on 04 Aug 09, 16:44:45 I really hope more people go to his website ... because this number of views? is shocking for the value of this amazing information
Ditto? By: JLZesbaugh. on 11 Apr 09, 00:26:17 Ditto?
only 6.000 views ... By: 11141983. on 02 Apr 09, 10:06:52 only 6.000 views for this wonderful lecture, we would have to pay thousands in college tuition to receive this lecture. If it was a Rhiana video it would have like 50 million views.?
this guy? is a ... By: 11141983. on 29 Mar 09, 15:03:08 this guy? is a fantastic lecturer
You're ok, I'm ... By: clayphish. on 11 Mar 09, 03:12:13 You're ok, I'm basically doing the same as? you.
I've started from ... By: U2BHistory. on 17 Feb 09, 06:12:38 I've started from the beginning.? The last couple have been very educating in things that I didn't understand because they went past the part that I dealt with in the Mortgage part of things. I think one of the issues that we need to uncover is where did the $23B go when they paid back those loans in the beginning. Someone's standing on the sidelines and they are going to buy up the entire banking business here pretty soon and monopolize it.
Very clear ... By: maccagrabme. on 23 Jan 09, 08:20:59 Very clear explanation, thank you for that. It's a shame that mainstream media does not take 10 mins of primetime to explain this to viewers as it would highlight just how ridiculous the situation really is, particularly? the UK right now.
how come?? By: LuminaChannel. on 28 Dec 08, 09:05:44 how come??
you're weird? By: blackspoty2. on 28 Dec 08, 04:05:40 you're weird?
anyone want to chat ... By: 381408. on 23 Dec 08, 02:25:08 anyone want to chat
i need someone smart to keep me entertained? NS
This is amazing! ... By: LuminaChannel. on 07 Nov 08, 15:28:28 This is amazing! I've always dreamed of understanding this whole financial system but never thought it was possible? to understand it! I started the playlist 16 video ago and I'm still there at 7:30 AM understanding! This is SO WELL DONE!
Tx!
OMG, this guy is ... By: 7malefiz7. on 20 Oct 08, 22:17:19 OMG, this guy is talking his? head off!
lol, yeah I know ... By: pongman. on 11 Oct 08, 22:28:56 lol, yeah I know but it doesn't have the hedge fund aspects, short selling, nor the AIG part. I think there is a software game called Capitalism but not certain how much detail? that entails.
Sure riled? up a ... By: ckerchum. on 01 Mar 12, 21:29:14 Sure riled? up a bunch of republiconneds. ;)
NO NO! The rich ... By: 1971SuperLead. on 30 Jun 11, 00:13:07 NO NO! The rich need to be richer! Let's give them all the money!?
If you increase ... By: Subsw00fers. on 24 Jun 11, 19:41:04 If you increase more taxes the rich will always find a way to avoid it. It wouldn't be fair to target the rich so the middle and lower class is also affected.?
I used to really ... By: VirtualMayham. on 22 Jun 11, 05:56:57 I used to really like you guys because you were totally unbiased and? balanced but now all you do is spout communist, progressive crap. I'm sorry but please go back to simply reporting the news in an unbiased way.
Just? because these ... By: mrme437. on 21 Jun 11, 18:39:07 Just? because these two idiots are not seccessful socializm should be forced among us........................these two are scarry commies!!LOL,LOL,LOL
The ultimate " ... By: yakyakyak69. on 05 May 11, 17:17:51 The ultimate "trickle-down" economics is Keynesianism where gov't "stimulates" the economy by flying over "special interests" w/helicopters full other people's cash.
The Fed & IRS corrupt crony politicians with power to redistribute,? borrow & debase to buy "support" from Special Interest Groups, Unions, "Too Big to Fail" Corporations, the Military-Industrial Complex & Wall Street cartel.
Watch:? "Money As Debt" & "Statism's Assembly Line" here on YouTube
LEARN!
lol? the rich get ... By: 98DevilDog79. on 01 May 11, 10:28:57 lol? the rich get richer - really? Chenk nuts must think those smart enough to make it rich intantaneously become stupid upon making their first million... fuckin idiots.
How much money do ... By: RedStormCommingIn. on 22 Mar 11, 07:43:39 How much money do you make, Stink Igor? Probably quit a lot.
But communists like you sure don't mind being rich. Its everyone else? you want to keep poor.
It's not even " ... By: Cosmo1093. on 29 Jan 11, 02:55:10 It's not even "sharing debt" anymore if people want to raise taxes for the rich without raising their own taxes - it's just trying to pay more and more with others' money. But of course people would be fine with using other peoples' money to pay, right? But once it becomes your money or your "grades", I guarantee you that you'll be pretty damn pissed.
You make it sound? like the rich are magically immune to financial problems..they can make mistakes too and face foreclosures and debt.
If 47% of Americans ... By: Cosmo1093. on 29 Jan 11, 02:36:33 If 47% of Americans owed no income taxes, then they are getting a massive "break" if you can even call it a break anymore. You are still punishing success if you have the other 53% to pay taxes, while the rest are getting away with paying nothing at all.. Even before the recession, each year, 35%+ owed no taxes.
Its more like the middle and upper class "paid the rich", not so much the poor.. And the middle class, upper class,? and rich are paying for the services the poor use.
The rich is already ... By: Ramel34. on 28 Jan 11, 23:10:17 The rich is already "relieved", meaning they are doing well. How do we know because you can look it up..The rich has gotten alot richer over the past years. It's not penalizing success if you don't offer relief to someone who doesn't need it. People that's struggling to survive need a break. The unemployment rate has risen and the deficit is out of control. The poor already paid the rich with the bailout, now they are getting a tax? break.
First of all, we're ... By: Ramel34. on 28 Jan 11, 22:34:09 First of all, we're talking apples and oranges. Let's start with your college grade scenario.? Sharing grades is different then sharing debt. In my eyes, an "A" is suppose to be a representation of the knowledge one has acquired. If you earned your degree in computers and I cheated off your paper to pass it would reflect in the job market. You have to understand that we are talking about a tax "break", meaning relief. Cont..
Lastly, don't the ... By: Cosmo1093. on 28 Jan 11, 04:41:29 Lastly, don't the well off run the businesses or corporations that provide goods and services which society wants or needs? Isn't that why you hand them your? money? Well, that means they are already benefiting society by providing said good or service at a presumably logical price, but then you turn around and say "your goods/services are great, but now you have to give me back my money because I need it more than you do."? Haven't they already done enough?!?
Also, yes everyone ... By: Cosmo1093. on 28 Jan 11, 04:31:28 Also, yes everyone is created equal, but? where you go from there determines where you will be in terms of wealth, social standing, etc. Some expect to have to work for what they get, and if they work hard enough, they'll likely succeed. Others expect to be given what they need, and they'll likely always stay in poverty - which is why welfare and food stamps are bad; (some of) the poor become reliant on such programs and it becomes a "lifestyle" for them. They won't get out of poverty.
Let's take 2 ... By: Cosmo1093. on 28 Jan 11, 04:23:09 Let's take 2 college students for an example; one (let's say this one is you) works his ass off every day and pulls in straight A's. Another sleeps all day, parties all night, etc, and fails every single class as a result. If the dean of students calls you in and says "you did really well, but he didn't, how about you give some of your good? grades to him?" What would your response be? Something to the extent of "Fuck no, I worked for it, he didn't!"? The same premise applies to wealth.
Allowing nearly ... By: Cosmo1093. on 28 Jan 11, 04:17:56 Allowing nearly half of the population (47%) to not owe any income tax at all is stupid as well, so it's only fair that other shouldn't have to pay as much. People are created with equal rights, but not wealth - nor should everyone be. It's not penalizing success if the taxpayer benefits from his/her own tax money, but that's not the case with programs like welfare and food stamps; it's the top half who pay, and some of the people? in the bottom half who benefit.
I'm simply saying ... By: Ramel34. on 28 Jan 11, 03:37:55 I'm simply saying that cutting taxes for people who are already well off is stupid. The reality is all people are not created equal. Example.. Some of us need food stamps to make it, so does that mean that everyone should get food stamps? Why shouldn't Joe Blow millionaire get free food every? month or WIC? That's like penalizing success right?
FLAT? TAX 10%!!!
... By: Salvysahagun. on 26 Jan 11, 05:19:14 FLAT? TAX 10%!!!
And the governments job is to enforce freedom no equality
Ya but the yacht ... By: Salvysahagun. on 26 Jan 11, 05:17:38 Ya but the yacht companies just made hella bank and pay hella people? to make those yachts
and my family got a bush tax cut made us open 4 new restrauntants and bought a cadilac escalade.
The lower class ... By: Cosmo1093. on 14 Jan 11, 03:33:26 The lower class would likely spend the money, but the middle class would likely save or invest the money for retirement. It will become more a matter of WHO saves the money rather than IF people save the money. Besides, the? rich spending money on a Porsche or yacht would still be putting money into the economy, which is still demand.
Why exactly should the rich be penalized anyway? I mean, given that 80% of millionaires are first-gen millionaires, all they did was succeed in life..
The? same FDR who ... By: Cosmo1093. on 14 Jan 11, 03:23:38 The? same FDR who instated the New Deal, which included 8 programs that were struck down by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional? The same FDR who tried to pack the Supreme Court to have his way? Oh, he also introduced the concept of deficit spending in order to pay for the New Deal which many economists believe simply prolonged and intensified the effects of the Great Depression. He also approved the internment of 100,000 Japanese-Americans. Damn, he was suchhh a great President.
Tax-cut history and ... By: Ramel34. on 07 Dec 10, 21:51:11 Tax-cut history and data from the Federal Reserve's Flow of Funds reports indicate that high-income earners prefer to save the money rather than spend it. During the Bush tax-cuts the savings rate for the rich increased? 2.8% the first quarter of 2002 compared to the minus 2% of the second quarter of 2001.
Show me the ... By: stepbrothers2. on 05 Dec 10, 01:58:43 Show me the statistics for that claim. If anything the rich are going to put more money in the stock market or something that gives them a good ROI. The top 1% paid more taxes? than the bottom 95% in 2007.
Take a trip around ... By: ingaingaghg. on 02 Dec 10, 08:24:42 Take a trip around the? world with and Naughty women mworld5.info
Video duration: 426 seconds
Global video hits: 11797
(ENGLISH SUBTITLES) can be found in CC (Closed Captions), little triangle in the corner of a screen.This is a sequel to the movie Trip To Karabakh, action takes place on the Caucasus. Georgians in Abkhazia are running out of bombs for their artillery, so they send Sniper named Spartak to Nagorno-Karabakh to buy and bring supplies to Abkhazia.
Tuossahan ... By: Jayo436. on 18 Apr 12, 06:35:58 Tuossahan Uuspaavalniemi antaa selityksen Yhdysvaltojen tavalle kasvattaa kuplaa, setelirahoitus. Kohta on se kaksi vuotta tuosta videosta ja onhan tässä tehty Suomen mittakaavassa käsittämättömän suuret takausvastuut, jotta etelä-Eurooppa säilyy hengissä ja ennenkaikkea euro vakaana. Juuri oli muuten uutisissa Espanjan ja Italian erittäin suurista talousvaikeuksista, joiden jälkeen Kreikka ei tuntunut enää missään.. Siis jos jatketaan kuplan? kasvattamista.
Siis.. meidän ... By: 123Tagi. on 12 Jan 12, 11:17:11 Siis.. meidän kuplatalous hajoaa kahdessa vuodessa, mutta amerikkalaiset ovat taiteilleet jo 1930-luvulta asti? Noh, videosta on keväällä jo kaksi? vuotta.
Amerikan ... By: sikajaperkele. on 26 May 11, 09:39:09 Amerikan Yhdysvalloissa on ainakin pari presidenttiä yrittänyt kaataa Federal Reserve? pankin ylivallan. John Adams ja John F Kennedy... Molemmat kuoli melko pian sen jälkeen.
ensimmäistä kertaa? ... By: kaupunkimoukari. on 25 Mar 11, 17:49:43 ensimmäistä kertaa? kuulen kun puhutaan triljoonista euroista..
resurssipohjainen? ... By: Kaljatynnyri. on 02 Jan 11, 01:56:14 resurssipohjainen? talous on se millä pitää mennä
Google osaa kääntää ... By: okkiev. on 11 Oct 10, 17:26:22 Google osaa kääntää myös lennosta, kunhan? ensin on tekstitetty yhdelle kielelle. En tuossa vaiheessa löytänyt tätä ominaisuutta.
-
olkoot nyt; toistaiseksi.
Sitäpaitsi noi tekstitykset saa pois päältä.
No ei tommosia ... By: TeeDee87. on 11 Oct 10, 12:40:43 No ei tommosia tekstejä kannata julkaista ollenkaan. Tekee? enemmän haittaa kuin hyötyä
Mies puhuu asiaa.? By: pave63. on 11 Oct 10, 09:46:30 Mies puhuu asiaa.?
Tos on tän ... By: raipe42. on 06 Oct 10, 17:29:51 Tos on tän valtakunnan? yks kovimmist jätkistä!
Google translator.
... By: okkiev. on 04 Oct 10, 17:51:15 Google translator.
Mielelläni julkaisen parempia käännöksiä, jos vain joku viitsii tehdä. Minulta saa? valmiin käännöspohjan.
Suomenkielinen tekstitys on eduskunnan pöytäkirjasta.
Google translator.
... By: okkiev. on 04 Oct 10, 17:49:59 Google translator.
Mielelläni julkaisen parempia käännöksiä, jos vain joku? viitsii tehdä.
Suomenkielinen tekstitys on eduskunnan pöytäkirjasta.
Google translator.
... By: okkiev. on 04 Oct 10, 17:46:38 Google translator.
Mielellään julkaisen parempia käännöksiä, jos vain joku viitsii? tehdä.
Kuka ton käännöksen ... By: St1yD. on 04 Oct 10, 06:03:05 Kuka ton käännöksen oikeen on tehny? Eihä tossa söperryksessä mitä englanniksi lukee? ole mitään järkeä.
Hyvä puhe ... By: SandVoop. on 03 Oct 10, 20:44:34 Hyvä puhe Uusipaavalniemeltä. En tiedä onko tuo oikeassa yläkulmassa olevan henkilön? ilme ihan vaan perusilme vai eikö hän tykkää, kun asioita kyseenalaistetaan? :D
Jep. itsekkin olen ... By: masa889988. on 28 Sep 10, 19:27:39 Jep. itsekkin olen tuon kullan osto homman huomannut.? Se on vaan semmonen juttu että tuo kulta/hopea on vain seuraava välimuoto tässä farssissa ja niillä ei päästä kovin pitkälti eteenpäin. sitte ku kulta ja hopea menettää arvonsa ja asiat on aivan persiillään niin ainut asia millä on oikiasti arvoa on viljelyskelpoinen maa sillä siitä tosiasiasta ei voi kiistellä että ihmisen pitää syödä ja sen takia maan arvo tulee nousemaan pilviin kuhan tämä kriisi tästä pahenee. aika näyttää millon se on.
Kerrankin ... By: ukkram09. on 15 Sep 10, 01:13:36 Kerrankin poliitikko joka puhuu todella? tärkeistä asioista, joista muut poliitikkomme vaikenevat. Tällaisia herroja eduskuntaan enemmän!
Markku puhuu asiaa ... By: omBrezeeNamaha. on 07 Sep 10, 00:37:16 Markku puhuu asiaa ja? tämän kaltaisia rohkeita puheenvuoroja tarvitaan lisää että herätään katsomaan kriittisesti talousjärjestelmästä aiheutuvia suunnattomia ongelmia ennen kuin on liian myöhäistä. Lisää infoa missä mennään ja mitä voisi asian eteen tehdä zeitgeist.fi
Olet täysin ... By: Ampuhaukka. on 29 Jul 10, 21:00:49 Olet täysin oikeassa.
Itse tajusin reilu vuosi sitten, että kannattaisi ostaa hopeaa/kultaa, tosin eipä ole ollut ylimääräistä millä tuota ostaisi, kun näistä asioista olisi tiennyt semmoiset 5 vuotta sitten, niin omakin taloustilanne näyttäisi tällä hetkellä hyvin erilaiselta. (Älkää verratko tätä nyt mihinkään "kun olis ostanut nokian osakkeita sillon joskus" tyylisiin juttuihin, näistä asioista olisi voinut tietää aikaisemminkin, harmi kun en vain ollut hereillä tuolloin.?
Seuraavaksi käydään ... By: Odin1978. on 20 Jul 10, 14:23:30 Seuraavaksi käydään kauppaa kullalla ja hopealla kun tämä fiat-rahajärjestelmä romahtaa. Ihmisten kannattaisi varautua tähän hankkimalla kyseisiä metalleja. Kultaa ja hopeaa ei voi painaa lisää niin kuin paperirahaa ja niiden? tuotanto on hidasta. Joten varautukaa ja ostakaa niitä.
Uusipaavalniemi ... By: freebase001. on 06 Jun 10, 10:06:21 Uusipaavalniemi tietää? mistä puhuu.
Tästä tulee kaikkien lamojen äiti!
![Obama\](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5gf3mYURp0/2.jpg "Obama\")
![It\](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Hk8yAEn662M/2.jpg "It\")
Latest comments made on this video:
By: Stephen Githinji. on 21 May 12, 12:06:52
FACING FORECLOSURE ? WANT TO STOP FORECLOSURE FAST KNOW A SHOKING SECRET Your Lender Hopes You Never Find Out., THE FORECLOSURE DEFENSE IS A MONUMENTAL DIRECTIVE FOR REMOVING AND SMOTHERING THE LENDING INSTITUTIONS AND WALL STREET EVIL DOERS WHO HAVE TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF THE? HOMEOWNERS WE lay out BY POINT What the banks have done with the note through the securitization process. DISCOVER IF YOUR BANK IS BREAKING THE LOW BY FORECLOSING ON YOUR HOME ILLEGALLY CALL OUR LIVE LINE 888-641-9063 NOW
By: iiKluutchyz. on 15 Apr 12, 07:04:16
lol?
By: tiebouttgwueu83c. on 03 Mar 12, 13:04:52
Enjoy the iphone4 TIME! Click here to get your iphone4! tEKMsB 27go.info?
By: TheVaibhav00793. on 13 Dec 11, 18:37:04
Thank you? :)
By: vmucci729. on 10 Dec 11, 23:19:10
Im a Mortgage Banker not a broker. Im a direct lender with a FSB (Federal Savings Bank) call me and I will give you a free consultation of what your new numbers will be if you have a? current mortgage. New purchases only need 3.5% down through FHA. 917-620-8805 Vito.
By: andromedas13. on 18 Nov 11, 01:39:59
This is is? what i'm looking for. Thanks
By: paulceltics. on 17 Apr 11, 04:45:10
good music?
By: UdallIn72. on 13 Feb 11, 01:19:27
Khan's kind of mischaracterized the nature of the bank's security interest. In a Torrens system, the title to the house is? registered in the name of the borrower. That is, the bank buys the house for you and has title placed in your name. What the bank retains is a right to kick you out and sell the house if the debt isn't paid according to the contract. This isn't the same as saying that the bank "owns" the house. The borrower owns the house--subject to the bank's mortgage interest.
By: UdallIn72. on 13 Feb 11, 01:12:35
The significant thing about student loans, though, is that they are for the most part not extinguished upon discharge from bankruptcy. That means that, unlike other debts, it continues to exist after a debtor's gone all the way? through a bankruptcy. Since the main reason a creditor takes security is to avoid having to share in a bankruptcy distribution, the fact that the debt's not extinguished at the end means student loan debt is almost as good to the lender as secured debt.
By: UdallIn72. on 13 Feb 11, 01:11:34
A student loan could, in theory, be secured, but generally speaking they are not. If the bank wanted to secure the loan, they could take a security interest? in any property (including after-acquired property) they wanted. That'd just be something for the debtor and lender to agree to amongst themselves.
By: mariomaruf. on 02 Nov 10, 10:27:25
You? said "Hey, I made a 2000 dollar payment and my equity only went up $410,000."
By: FortNikitaBullion. on 25 Sep 10, 21:37:31
You can also drop? to a lower bracket as a result of the deduction, so it can be more that you save, right?
By: FortNikitaBullion. on 25 Sep 10, 21:23:56
Technically, it's your knowledge. That's why you can't erase student loan? debt with a bankruptcy, since they can't repossess your brain.
By: masipula11. on 28 Jun 10, 18:14:48
What is the video called in which you actually show how? to calculate the monthly payment
By: conetolor. on 04 Apr 10, 17:29:03
Excellent video -? I'm curious if your views have changed since your thought-provoking series a couple of years ago about the advantages of renting over buying. keep up the good work!
By: bernicedan. on 02 Apr 10, 05:58:45
I know this is totally unrelated... but I am just curious about how student loans work ... if a house title secures a mortgage loan.. is? there something that secures student loans.. and what is it?
By: shakaama. on 01 Apr 10, 21:55:09
Khan I know you mean well, so I feel no regret asking you. Could you give equal time in a video showing a person who has decided to pay cash for a house and take us from start to finish how he could save to do that. People feel daunted? by such a prospect and I know it is not a daunting task. Too much emphasis has been placed in this country into indebting Americans. No one has told them there is an actual option not to take out loans.
By: JewTubeUsername. on 01 Apr 10, 05:11:17
Always makes me sick. Pretty much one of the biggest reasons why banks and fractional reserve exist. Conjure money out of nothing, in exchange for possession of real resources, and hoping the client won't be able to pay back. (Mainly done through interest) Long, and very outbranching story, but it's despicable. Check the net for topics on? that. Fractional reserve banks = scum. Interest = poison.
By: stephane19771. on 01 Apr 10, 04:12:58
wonderful?
By: stephane19771. on 01 Apr 10, 04:12:56
wonderful?
By: stephane19771. on 01 Apr 10, 04:12:47
wonderful?
By: sonycompa. on 01 Apr 10, 02:40:06
I am tax accountant and I hope people pay attention to the mortgage tax deduction portion of your video. People are often misled by? brokers etc.
By: cristoretornebiblia. on 31 Mar 10, 22:41:08
I like?