thanks for your ... By: ALITL8. on 05 Sep 09, 21:01:57 thanks for your comments, rating and compliment, cubmasterflex. i actually used diesel fuel for this little demonstration though. not that it really matters because office fires (which are supposedly responsible for the destruction of WTC 7) don't cause at or near free fall speed collapses of steel/concrete/glass buildings... well, except for? this one time when it caused the collapse of 3.
Couldn't fit this ... By: cubmasterflex. on 01 Sep 09, 18:59:25 Couldn't fit this into the other two, but thanks for this video man. You definitely demonstrated the idea everyone's been arguing about for years? very simply. And Im sure the kids bitching about it being too simple are also bitching at the videos with actual chemical equations for being too complex. 5 stars.
And anyone who ... By: cubmasterflex. on 01 Sep 09, 18:56:26 And anyone who knows anything about chemistry knows that the AMOUNT of matter doesn't affect the temperature at which it burns, nor does the amount of fuel. So, unless the WTC had something inside of it already that burns hotter than either of those fuels it just doesn't add up. It's a perfectly set up experiment that I don't see anyone else testing. And anyone who thinks that the government would actually allow? a test like this with laboratory controlled conditions needs to lay down the crack.
Let me just throw ... By: cubmasterflex. on 01 Sep 09, 18:52:56 Let me just throw this out there. All of you people hating on this guy for not having a "scientific experiment" are very, very stupid. If you actually look up what he told? you to look up you'd see that A-1 Jet Fuel burns at 287.5 °C. Gasoline burns at 471°-560°C. So, any idiot can conclude that gas is hotter, which is what he's using. PLUS, the metal that he's using, ESPECIALLY INCLUDING THE FRYING PAN, is MUCH weaker than the structural steel used in the towers, and NONE OF THAT EVEN MELTED.
where's the ... By: ALITL8. on 12 May 09, 19:45:27 where's the wreckage? where's the investigation? where's the reconstruction? i didn't say? anything about what hit the Pentagon or crashed in PA. answer the question!
Let me guess, you ... By: Archonis. on 12 May 09, 19:35:02 Let me guess, you don't think an airliner hit the Pentagon or crashed in PA either?!?
More uneducated conspiracy nonsense brought to you by George Soros.
Next time? I need asbestos removed I'll give you a call!
where's the ... By: ALITL8. on 12 May 09, 19:16:14 where's the aluminum from the Pentagon or? Shankesville? in past airline/NASA incidents there has always been a collection of wreckage to examine... where's the wreckage? where's the reconstruction? ever seen the wreckage from the Space Shuttle?? YES YOU HAVE!! they gathered it all up, put it in a warehouse and ran a proper investigation.
dont waste my time Archon. didn't get enough in our conversation on MySpace??
Where's the ... By: Archonis. on 12 May 09, 04:43:49 Where's the aluminum from the airliners?
What happens when you add 90,000 liters of Burning jet fuel and 50,000 tons of floors per level travelling at 32ft per sec^2?
This ain't rocket science but it don't look like? NASA needs an On-Site Supervisor with an A+B license.
wasn't really ... By: ALITL8. on 02 Mar 09, 03:24:08 wasn't really looking? for scientific credit hence the title... common sense will do when it comes to fire, structural steel, heat transfer, etc., etc.
anyone that's ever used a cutting torch should understand my simple man science.
You? need to do ... By: CHANNELMICHAEL. on 07 Feb 09, 12:51:07 You? need to do this to scale to merit any scientific credit.
machines creating ... By: ALITL8. on 10 Aug 08, 20:37:04 machines creating what temperature? what is the open air burn temperature of jet fuel or should i say kerosene? i can guarantee you its NOT 1100-1800°F. those temperature can ONLY be reached in a controlled environment (i.e. fire triangle).
there are definitely many variables to consider but the fact remains, heat from those fires is NOT what brought? those buildings down... fireproofing or not.
watch my playlists on 9/11 science, building fires, controlled demolition and car fires
no, i don't know ... By: pontolones. on 10 Aug 08, 18:56:07 no, i don't know anything about installing underground storage tanks, but i do know that that is a lot different than knowing about the supporting structure of a 100 story building.
your little experiment, while fun, is not accurately reproducing all the factors involved in a structure like the wtc buildings.
you need machines recreating the same temperature,? and the same type and amount of stress that these structures had on them.
its not rocket science to know that this isn't real science.
hey there city ... By: ALITL8. on 10 Aug 08, 04:48:03 hey there city slicker... what is jet fuel?
apparently the "experts" dont know either nor have they come up with anything better than a "working hypothesis (THEORY)" for how "3" buildings managed to collapse in 7 yrs of "professional" investigation.
bet you didnt know that gasoline burns? hotter than jet fuel, did ya? how much do you know about the fire triangle? how much do you know about fuel and fire safety?
Google: On-Site Supervisor License A+B
this redneck knows a little more than YOU!
THIS JUST IN, SOME ... By: pontolones. on 10 Aug 08, 03:08:26 THIS JUST IN, SOME REDNECK IN TEXAS PROVED 9/11 AN INSIDE JOB, USING A SKILLET AND SOME DIESEL FUEL IN HIS DRIVEWAY.? lul. can you please do some more mind blowing (and extremely scientific) experiments?
thanks, if you ... By: ALITL8. on 04 Jul 08, 20:30:12 thanks, if you look? at my playlists you can embed the code of all 4... spread the truth!!
Great? video By: Lungyao1. on 04 Jul 08, 14:44:57 Great? video
hahaha wasnt me :o ... By: ALITL8. on 20 Nov 08, 01:42:04 hahaha wasnt me :o)? if i was going to give you the thumbs down i would have started a long time ago. i dont fear debate
LOL ever consider the "poor" rating was based on some other form of reasoning? ;o)
haha someone gave? ... By: lordjared. on 20 Nov 08, 00:40:04 haha someone gave? me a poor comment point because i'm right.
we? can figure out ... By: ALITL8. on 30 Oct 08, 00:42:22 we? can figure out who done it after we figure out how it was done. office fires DO NOT "collapse" steel buildings at or near free fall speed into their own footprint.
yes skepticism and ... By: lordjared. on 27 Oct 08, 00:03:30 yes skepticism and nullified bs, and that's all that those people have brought to the table too.
now if you could show me a blueprint for the explosives set in the building, a soundbite of bush giving the military the green light to fly the "missles" into the towers, or any CONFESSIONS (which is what i meant when i was? talking about people keeping their mouths shut.) i might jump on to your insane theory.
skepticism and ... By: ALITL8. on 17 Oct 08, 16:44:22 skepticism and nullified BS?
1550+ that arent? keeping their mouths shut
140+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials
600+ Engineers and Architects
130+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals
300+ Professors Question 9/11
170+ Artists, Entertainers, and Media Professionals
210+ 9/11 "Survivors and Family Members"
what "evidence"?
... By: lordjared. on 15 Oct 08, 21:44:27 what "evidence"?
to my knowledge there is NO EVIDENCE that? implies 9/11 was planned by our government. no confessions, (we're talking 1,000's of people here, all keeping their mouths shut.) no sightings of any passengers aboard the planes, no traces of any explosive substances (and there should be an abundance of it in order to bring down those buildings.) Just skepticism and a whole bunch of other nullified BS.
nope, earth is ... By: ALITL8. on 15 Oct 08, 00:16:51 nope, earth is round (sorta) and to "assume" generally leads to making an Ass out of U and Me.
too much evidence completely omitted and not investigated, too? many questions went unanswered.
there NEEDS to be an "independent" investigation. we were NOT attacked because are rich and/or free.
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
you sir, are? a ... By: lordjared. on 14 Oct 08, 20:39:48 you sir, are? a doofus.
variables like a ... By: lordjared. on 14 Oct 08, 20:39:13 variables like a commercial? airliner at 500 mph?
and i would have assumed that you were someone who believes the earth is flat, and that we didn't land on the moon and that the skipper from gilligan's island killed jfk.
variables like "the ... By: ALITL8. on 13 Oct 08, 07:25:55 variables like "the conservation of momentum"?
gimme a break, NIST used "hot water over a tight jar lid" to explain a "new phenomena" now know as "thermal expansion" that caused the symmetrical, progressive (at free fall speed?)? collapse of 7 World Trade and you bought that load of crap.
The official story is simply someone else's hypothesis (theory) and "some" people are gullible enough to believe it. "Some" people still believe the earth is flat too.
"that's the PROOF ... By: lordjared. on 12 Oct 08, 15:16:11 "that's the PROOF right there."? perfect.
only that you're missing about a million variables...
Fuel burns off ... By: JasonBrumfeld. on 01 Sep 08, 04:05:51 Fuel burns off very? quickly. Office furniture and supplies do not creat the heat to weaken steel in that short of a time.
Take a cutting torch which burns far far hotter then the best open fuel fires can. See how long it takes you to cut thru just regular steel plating. And thats not structural steel with is stronger.
It takes a considerable amount of time with the cutting torch focused on a small area very slowly allowing you to cut thru.
yea, especially " ... By: ALITL8. on 06 Jul 08, 03:58:23 yea, especially "structural" steel... ever seen how they make that stuff???
while I was ... By: theonlyreallaz. on 06 Jul 08, 01:29:55 while I was thinking about your video I had an idea:
to put in a public place a big fire burning not for minutes not for hours but for whatever time it will be necessary to convince the skeptics once for all that? it is impossible to melt steel in this way.
Of course it could be a little difficoult to get the authorisation to do something like that but perhaps in some isolated place like where they do "the burning man" it could be done.
thats really all it ... By: ALITL8. on 04 Jul 08, 20:27:10 thats really all it is... what's sad is that it appears no one has? any :o/
common sense at? ... By: theonlyreallaz. on 04 Jul 08, 19:55:21 common sense at? last!
Are you? serious? ... By: saginata. on 20 May 11, 19:22:42 Are you? serious? Why should that steel bend? Assuming you put 1000N (~100kg) of force, the beam is? 18x40mm, the pan is 300mm in diameter and assuming you apply the force in the middle, that's only about 20-30MPa of stress. That steel could be weakened to 10% of its strength and still not bend. Steel can take between 200-1000MPa.
"playlist so? ... By: ALITL8. on 06 Apr 11, 17:21:29 "playlist so? called 911 truth"
i'm not finding that playlist on your page. your? playlists include "If Ye Truth" and "Whitebox".
believe it or not, ... By: ALITL8. on 06 Apr 11, 17:14:06 believe it or not, i believed the official story? about how the buildings collapsed until i actually looked at the evidence for myself. like i said earlier in this conversation, i spent most of my life in the construction industry and nearly 10 yrs of it in gas and oil construction (Google: A+B Licensed On Site Supervisor and look up the qualifications needed for acquiring that license). i'll look at your playlist but it's quite likely i've already seen and considered the info.
Buildings 3,4,5, ... By: ZhugeNaut. on 06 Apr 11, 15:15:29 Buildings 3,4,5, and 6 all had to be demolished.
You know what? You want to see how the debris affected 7. Go watch my playlist so called? 911 truth. It is always better to demonstrate.
7 had big smoking holes in it and parts of 7 were collapsing early in the morning.
You only see the face of the building that was facing away from the WTC in all the videos.
Why dont you take a look at the play list and see how the other side, inside and the street full of debris.
yep, floors did ... By: ALITL8. on 06 Apr 11, 05:57:28 yep, floors did collapse and some steel probably weakened too but i didnt say anything about explosions (which were reported by many witnesses), i said NIST did not test for explosives residue.
i doubt? that plane impacts, localized structural damage and office can completely destroy 3 buildings (super-structures) on the same day... especially when one of them wasn't even hit by a plane.
ever consider that part of the plan was to make a huge mess in the financial center of the world?
how much is a lot? ... By: ALITL8. on 06 Apr 11, 05:50:50 how much is a lot? during my career in construction, i spent nearly 10 yrs as an A+B licensed on-site supervisor in the gas and oil industry. you can trust that i've considered it thoroughly (or not). the buildings designer actually said that the buildings could withstand up to 2 airliner impacts and remain standing. you dont have to duplicate the exact? same conditions to say that this event couldn't happen the way it's been suggested. it matters cause someone had to be on the inside
@AL
I am pretty ... By: ZhugeNaut. on 05 Apr 11, 02:56:48 @AL
I am pretty certain they did not need explosives in the building. floors collapsing,....yea floors collapsing, debris and bodies hitting cars were called explosions that day.
Not bombs. Explosion is just a sound..
I doubt the people that planned that expected the buildings to fall the way they did. It is not likely.
Not that I think they care about the people, but it made? a huge mess in the financial center of the world.
They even lied to ppl and told them it was safe to get help cleaning
You can say that. I ... By: ZhugeNaut. on 05 Apr 11, 02:41:43 You can say that. I have no doubt you believe what? you are saying but I dont think you have considered this thoroughly.
How many buildings have been hit with high speed 767s with a lot of jet fuel.
Even the buildings designer emphasize they made it to withstand a slow flying lost aircraft.
Unless you can duplicate the exact same conditions it is hard to say that this event couldn't happen the way is suggested.
What does it matter how it happened? Its no excuse for whats being done.
i've been in ... By: ALITL8. on 05 Apr 11, 01:35:12 i've been in construction most my life and i'm no kid. i can say, without hesitating, that steel and concrete framed buildings do not collapse in the manner WTC 1, 2 and 7 did without the assistance of explosives. i suggest you check out NIST's excuses as to why they "chose" not to test the steel for explosives residue: wtc? dot nist dot gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006 dot htm
Nists FAQ page? no. ... By: ZhugeNaut. on 05 Apr 11, 00:43:06 Nists FAQ page? no.
Once you concede that the fire had an effect on the steel you cant say? what effect it would have.unless you duplicate the experiment exactly as it happened.
Not stacking trays, not burning pots.
I am not much of a fan of the govt story, but I am a Nyer. Ive studied this matter. I am not going to pretend as if I know who did it, but i smell a rat.
This is a red herring. Everyone is stuck on how it was done. The ramifications of the event continue today.
with or without ... By: ALITL8. on 04 Apr 11, 23:53:47 with or without fireproofing, heat weakened steel and localized structural damage? don't cause buildings to collapse in the manner that WTC 1, 2 and 7 did. why didnt NIST test the steel for explosives residue? do you really believe that it would be impossible for investigators to distinguish between typical building materials and explosives? thats one of the weak excuse NIST would like you to accept... i assume you've read their FAQs page, right?
If you? really ... By: ZhugeNaut. on 04 Apr 11, 15:41:51 If you? really think fire could not weaken the steel please tell me why you suspect they fireproofed it in the first place.
You see that GALVANIZED steel you are using. WHERE IS THE FIRE PROOFING?
NO? NONE RIGHT?Apples and Oranges?Yea.....Please stop letting them laugh at you this way.
no thermometer? - ... By: ObiWanShinobi1. on 10 Nov 09, 13:59:57 no thermometer? - just a? weak fire in a cast iron pan? You're part right - that ain't science.
while this doesnt ... By: vengencefrom1979. on 30 Jul 09, 21:14:56 while this doesnt compare to the simulation done by UL it is a good show.? thanks.
Newton's Third Law ... By: bIZAROsPRMN11. on 18 Jan 09, 04:01:34 Newton's Third Law is ALL the evidence needed to prove controlled demolition.
citizens of U.S.A. ; stand up or stand down.
a Socially Adept? Psychopath is capable of mass murder.
a Socially Adept Psychopath is capable of being elected president.
it is long past time for a criminal investigation and trial.
if you CHOOSE to stand down know what you are standing down to.
Newtons Third Law ... By: bIZAROsPRMN11. on 18 Jan 09, 03:51:29 Newtons Third Law is all the evidence needed to prove controlled demolition of WTC 1 and 2.
NIST knows this. this is why NIST chose to stand down.
NIST admits their report
"... does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower" after? the conditions for collapse initiation were reached ... ."
NIST - 2005
the time for a CRIMINAL investigation is seven years overdue. it is long overdue for criminal charges to be brought against those responsible for murder of nearly 3,000 people.
You're on two legs? ... By: sxmadrid. on 05 Dec 08, 00:05:48 You're on two legs? but your mouth's at groin level.
Have you seen the ... By: sxmadrid. on 04 Dec 08, 09:43:05 Have you seen the images of this plane apparently gliding into the building? They might be genuine, like the sun might not rise tomorrow, but shouldn't we look at the probabilty that the sun will rise tomorrow, and that the images are fake? In the end, if it's crimes we're looking for there are far bigger and far less arguable ones that followed 2001, but the dimensions of this ongoing psyop that is '9/11' are too fascinating and too? important to ignore. That's my position.
In? the battle of ... By: sxmadrid. on 03 Dec 08, 22:43:00 In? the battle of steel vs aluminum, steel wins every time, regardless of velocity or of which is travelling and which is stationery.
the steel i used is ... By: ALITL8. on 29 Nov 08, 21:11:03 the steel i used is incredibly weaker than the steel used in the WTC buildings, the fire's temperature is actually quite similar in the fact that its a kerosene/diesel fire in an "open air" environment.
jet fuel had no effect on the temperature of the fires and office fires dont cause complete catastrophic failure of steel? buildings.
it's really that simple but since i've already addressed this topic at least 3 times since posting these videos, i'll let you go read whats already been said.
hotjoe300,
you're ... By: ALITL8. on 29 Nov 08, 09:27:54 hotjoe300,
you're right, i could create my own environment by adding oxygen (air) to the fire, making it burn much hotter and you're right, i don't weigh as much as the world trade center buildings (thanks for noticing) and you're right once again, maybe i didn't press down.
what exactly is your point? aluminum foil and "galvanized" steel dont compare to the construction grade? materials that went into those buildings either...
thats kinda my point!
I replied to your? ... By: ALITL8. on 05 Nov 08, 07:00:57 I replied to your? PM with those credintials, correct?
Galicgalen said in ... By: ALITL8. on 05 Nov 08, 06:56:36 Galicgalen said in PM: I concede to the fact that Jet- A1 is the more commonly used Jet fuel. Around 81 billion gallons a year of Jet-A1 are consumed.
If you want to go knowledge about Jet fuel, then on guard.
I hold an Air BP quality control cert.
I hold a Hazwoper cert.
I hold fueling training certs for:
Mesa Airlines
Skywest Airlines
United
Frontier
Alaska
I also hold GA training certs.
Alas,? I hold a pilots license.
Dont be shy Galicgalen... Alas, I have credentials too :o)
I'll fill this in as questions are asked.
FYI - JET A-1 OPEN AIR burn temp is 549.5 PLEASE LOOK IT UP!!! GOOGLE "Fire Triangle" to understand "OPEN AIR". A contained fire (oxygen deprived) will probably not reach "open air" specs so temps would be much lower.
yes, im a redneck :o)
WHY?
For the ... By: Archonis. on 15 Jun 09, 12:58:02 WHY?
For the same reason crashing two Hot Wheels toy cars? together doesn't simulate the conditions of a real car accident.
makes YOUR ... By: hgfbob. on 15 Jun 09, 12:35:20 makes YOUR experiment all? the more laughable"-
-WHY?
is that the best ... By: ALITL8. on 13 May 09, 23:38:54 is that the best you got? a little name calling??
anyone that wants to can Google:
A+B License On Site Supervisor
They can also take a? look at the information I was required to study and be tested on annually. (30 TAC §334)
so yea, for all intents and purposes, i am also qualified to remove asbestos. as a matter of fact I have the OSHA/HAZMAT/HAZWOPPER training and certification to supervise the procedure as well :o)
I know plenty about ... By: Archonis. on 12 May 09, 19:37:25 I know plenty about both, Mr asbestos removal supervisor, and that's? what makes your "experiment" all the more laughable!
and if you knew ... By: ALITL8. on 12 May 09, 19:07:17 and if you knew anything about fuel and fire dynamics you'd know why.? dont waste my time Archon. didn't get enough in our conversation on MySpace??
That's funny when ... By: Archonis. on 12 May 09, 04:31:39 That's funny when the airliners? crashed in to the WTC they burst into flame immediately!
a skyscraper is? ... By: Gromagolus. on 16 Jul 08, 15:13:11 a skyscraper is? nothing like a couple pieces of steel in the driveway...
there is no maybe, ... By: Gromagolus. on 16 Jul 08, 15:12:01 there is no maybe, or probably in science you cant just estimate whether it will be like that or not. read a fuckin? book
AWESOME RUN JERON!!! 13.36 @ 94.57 another win for Team Ford!!
if you have additional info about this race or the vehicles (i.e. mods, etc.) please feel free to comment.
video taken with Kodak C643 6.1mp digital camera so excuse the quality :o)
This video shows how and where to use tire shine. If you watched the Wheel/Wheel Well video you already know how to care for your wheel wells. There is no need to spray tire shine in your wheel wells if you maintain them properly.
my friend what ... By: oscarv362370. on 18 May 12, 14:34:00 my friend what product do you use? to clean your wheels? thanks
This Meguiar is a ... By: hemidesign. on 12 Dec 11, 06:29:33 This Meguiar is a shit product... you should try the best in the world: DryShine
last forever, you? should take a look at their website...
good luck! (dryshinetreatments. k o m)
nice colour blue? By: gnosismonk. on 09 Dec 11, 04:47:34 nice colour blue?
theyre the stock 20 ... By: ALITL8. on 09 Oct 11, 03:56:09 theyre the stock 20's that? come on the X5 4.8is... my son is kinda short though lol
that tire is almost ... By: jklslvch. on 07 Oct 11, 06:05:24 that tire is almost as big as you crouching...what size rims r? those?
the tire and wheel ... By: ALITL8. on 29 Jun 11, 08:41:28 the tire and wheel are not new. they've been maintained on a regular basis since this vehicle was new. that said, i can? and have cleaned/restored rims with 4 or more months of road grime, brake dust, grease, asphalt, etc on them and/or years of neglect and you're right, they're not as easy to clean. what's your point?
why u wash a new ... By: marra001. on 27 Jun 11, 16:12:02 why u wash a new tire i dont see a difrent man
afther u finish but try it afther 4 5 months lets see if u? can clean ur rims that easy
i dont think so
Here is an ... By: 67bandit67. on 30 May 11, 14:46:08 Here is an excellent tip for everyone - Put any Tire Shine on a little heavy "Right before you go to bed". After sitting for 8 hours it will "look" "WET" and "Last" a lot longer. If you drive an hour after you apply the shine the wind will literally blow the shine off. TRY IT! I have a tip for perfectly clear windows too. So clear I hit my head thinking the window was? open.
Nice. But i might ... By: sigfurt. on 25 Apr 11, 21:32:49 Nice. But i might as well? jump!
thanks, i'll let ... By: ALITL8. on 20 Mar 11, 02:11:24 thanks, i'll let the owner know you like it! LOL it's the X5 4.6is and yes,? it's pretty sweet inside and out ;o)
By the way nic car, ... By: agenthelios1. on 20 Mar 11, 00:36:55 By the way nic car, is that? an X5 or X3?
i used to work? in ... By: ALITL8. on 18 Mar 11, 17:03:55 i used to work? in the gas and oil industry... soap, degreaser and tire shine on my hands are probably the least of my worries. thanks for your concern though :o)
You should wear ... By: agenthelios1. on 18 Mar 11, 04:34:58 You should wear some nitrile gloves that shit will? fuck your hands up.
There is no ... By: MrElussive. on 12 Feb 11, 07:29:52 There is no evidence that silicone and solvent based tire shines negatively impact rubber over time. I prefer water-based tire dressing, but I don't hesitate to use a silicone tire dressing as long as it's a quality product. Silicone tire shines don't wash off into local water systems, either. ? I don't know where you came up with these ridiculous statements.
thats better? lol By: lockerzkrazy. on 10 Dec 10, 00:29:57 thats better? lol
im southern? and i ... By: ALITL8. on 26 Nov 10, 16:46:34 im southern? and i dont drive a BMW... one of my clients drives this BMW X5. i drive a 97' Ford Mustang with a 2000 motor, bolt ons, cams and exhaust when im not working ;o)
hows he a redneck ... By: lockerzkrazy. on 24 Nov 10, 03:04:21 hows he a redneck he? drives a bmw
thanks for the info ... By: ALITL8. on 18 Nov 10, 03:08:15 thanks for the info. i'd be more concerned with the water supply. most consumers dont keep tires on their vehicles long enough to see any noticeable degradation of a tire from the use of silicone based dressing. any suggestions on an environmentally? friendly/safe tire dressing?
Little known to the ... By: renewprotectvideo. on 17 Nov 10, 18:06:30 Little known to the consumer are the? detrimental effects of silicone on tires and trim. Nearly all products currently available as "tire dressings" and
"protectants" contain silicone. While these products do briefly enhance appearance, they also degenerate and damage the surfaces to which they are applied. They then quickly wash off into your local water systems. Moreover, many tire manufacturers' warranty plans will not cover dry rot damage if evidence of silicone usage is found.
If I put that on my ... By: moofushu. on 26 Oct 10, 05:57:07 If I put that on my wife's face will it make it look? as good as those tires?
I like the Meguiars ... By: Kprt23. on 01 Oct 10, 20:15:56 I like the Meguiars Hot Shine Trigger Spray also. Not? too shiny and is very durable. Do you use any dressing in the wheel wells? Meguiars Hyper-Dressing a 2:1 (can dilute up to 4:1) does a great job on clean wheel wells. I also use the same Eagle One Tire Swipes.
This 'redneck' is ... By: Rczapla67. on 30 Sep 10, 00:10:50 This 'redneck' is also driving a nicer car than you will ever get in your? life.
it's the Eagle One ... By: ALITL8. on 06 Sep 10, 13:33:07 it's the Eagle One tire swipe... they? work great, last long enough and the price is right at under $3 a pair.
Good job. What ... By: stunner5000pt. on 06 Sep 10, 01:50:04 Good job. What kindof applicator did u use?
And? i like your choice in music :)
Did you hit your ... By: alanciux. on 11 Nov 11, 06:44:53 Did you hit your hand? on 2:22? :s
Nice job bro, glad ... By: ULTIMATE330xi. on 15 Aug 11, 22:49:05 Nice job bro, glad to see someone puts in a little? effort into actually clean their rims. I got a 330xi and thats how they always look.
what type of? race ... By: ALITL8. on 26 Jul 11, 09:24:03 what type of? race wheels are we talking about?
Out of curiosity ... By: fish4kbcf. on 24 Jul 11, 05:34:25 Out of curiosity could you recommend any specific products to use on race wheels. They see a decent amount of? track time and high temperatures so they get pretty nasty. Id still like to use a product that is gentle as well....they might be track ready but I still like them to look good.
just take the wheel ... By: 123qwerty. on 10 Apr 11, 04:54:33 just take the wheel off, drench it in gasoline, rinse = super clean :)?
is? that guy ... By: MoisheKapoyr. on 25 Mar 11, 01:28:53 is? that guy mexican?
Great Job! I like ... By: kungming923. on 08 Dec 10, 15:44:46 Great Job! I like the way you? cleaned every single nooks, but you forgot to rinse! lol juz kidding ha ha ha
Great job ... By: Kprt23. on 01 Oct 10, 20:13:09 Great job demonstrating good technique. What kind of soap and degreaser do you use for the bucket solution? I detail part time and use Meguiars products. For the wheels and tires, I use Super Degreaser? at either 4:1 or 10:1 but for wheels I use All Purpose Cleaner at either 4:1 or 10:1. The ratio depends on how dirty the items are. I like the wheel brushes at autozone as they allow me to reach far into the wheel and I like a brush for the wheel face. A long brush for wheel wells is good too.
LOL, I learned all ... By: candle2k. on 18 Sep 10, 06:21:20 LOL, I learned all these little tricks from when my Dad's car got rims back when I used to drive his car. There's also little tricks about getting all the hard to reach spots such as Chrysler grilles, and others.. Detail work is very extensive, and if done right looks awesome, if done wrong, it looks? horrible. This is a great how-to on wheel washing.
you're not too ... By: ALITL8. on 12 Sep 10, 21:05:43 you're not too bright either, kingpin. we might cut ourselves occasionally but the job is done right... every time. if the rotor is too big we use a brush or remove the wheel (depending on the job). yes, there is soap and degreaser in our bucket used for? wheels and wells. on baked on/caked on wheels, we pre-soak them with a stronger mixture.
as for brushes in the wheel wells, my hands with a mitt does a better job than any brush. when they're caked we use a brush on them too
Wow I just watched ... By: mustangKINGPIN. on 12 Sep 10, 00:41:55 Wow I just watched the rest of the video. You use a hand mitt to get in? the wheel wells? Seriously? what happened to a brush
You are so stupid. ... By: mustangKINGPIN. on 12 Sep 10, 00:41:04 You are so stupid. Why don't you use? a wheel brush instead of cutting yourself and not even getting the job done right. What if the rotor is too big for you to put your hand down in there? Also way to use just soap to clean wheels. What about all that hard baked on brake dust? You don't know how to detail.
Good idea for ... By: Gamezero05. on 02 Jul 10, 21:27:15 Good idea for cleaning the wheel wells. I? have an old armor all wash mitt.. I don't know why I never thought to use it for that......
lol? that works too! By: ALITL8. on 22 Apr 10, 08:33:44 lol? that works too!
i took my wheel off ... By: cowroostie. on 21 Apr 10, 05:15:15 i took my wheel off to clean the wells ... is? that bad?
Nice technique? to ... By: watuzi. on 19 Apr 10, 05:06:00 Nice technique? to clean your wheels, but my 528i stock wheels dont have those (sigh)
im not sure what ... By: ALITL8. on 15 Apr 10, 18:18:56 im not sure what you mean by easier (brush or mitt)? but on lower vehicles a small hydraulic jack works great for getting inside the wheel well.
i think im gonna ... By: RyanLangz. on 15 Apr 10, 03:11:30 i think im gonna start using my old wash mitts to use in wheel wells cuz its prolly easier than a longhandled brush that cant? reach everything ! ! but then again this is easier on larger trucks and SUVs than small cars are to clean the wheel wells out .
Nice car. Le Mans ... By: nparagano. on 13 Apr 10, 01:01:28 Nice car. Le Mans Blue 4.8is
to thebarak: those are 20"? wheels
this video is cool? By: somersetjeff. on 17 Jan 10, 06:51:57 this video is cool?
That's either a ... By: thebarak. on 16 Sep 09, 22:56:35 That's either a giant wheel or a tiny person. His whole arm fits through the spokes and? around the tire! No wonder he can easily reach the inner surfaces.
Great car? and nice ... By: puricele7e. on 29 Jun 09, 15:42:29 Great car? and nice color as well ;-)
Great song? in the ... By: charlesaferg. on 09 May 09, 05:48:30 Great song? in the background, Eric Clapton - Cocaine.
almost there!!
still a few parts on the mod list that need to be installed...suspensi on stuff. this is idling, untuned and a cold start. i should have left the camera on a little longer cause she idled down a bit more and sounded very nice!
please excuse her appearance, shes had a bad stretch of luck :o/
watch?v=71r94lRwL7Q ... By: ALITL8. on 31 May 11, 22:53:42 watch?v=71r94lRwL7Q (all the details on the set up? are in the description)
i have the same car ... By: vereshchak. on 26 May 11, 20:01:34 i have the same car as you, whats your set up and how much she putting? out?
wow
sounds really ... By: justincheslik. on 03 Jan 09, 18:52:26 wow
sounds really nice,prety car,
im sorry about the body work
i bet it was some kind of SS or TA that was loosing,and decided to run into? you :/
well thats the blue ... By: carlosccclos. on 04 Jun 08, 17:39:14 well thats the blue i have on? it
holy shit thats how ... By: carlosccclos. on 04 Jun 08, 17:38:13 holy shit thats how my mustang looks but? mine has racing stripes
its not out tuned ... By: ALITL8. on 24 Nov 07, 07:54:48 its not out tuned or of the shop yet but from what ive seen so far its a LOT stronger. its a 2000 PI motor with? bolt ons and the cams, should make about 270ish.
hows? it run with ... By: MystikXing. on 24 Nov 07, 00:34:56 hows? it run with the cams?
An older rich guy I ... By: roaddiablo. on 13 Apr 09, 08:16:59 An older rich guy I know from sport bike nights has one of theese, he gave us stunters a ride to see just how fast it is.WOW, I raced it an couldnt leave it.?
i think thats a ... By: ALITL8. on 29 Mar 07, 16:42:25 i think thats a stock Lightning hood? (?)
if its aftermarket, i dont know... its a clients truck.
where did? you get ... By: MotoXfreestyle420. on 29 Mar 07, 04:54:44 where did? you get your hood?
headers are ... By: badmunkie513. on 13 Mar 10, 18:02:58 headers are straight? up so it doesnt have water cooled heads like a normal jet boat would,
prolly got a rad hidden somewhere
That's crazy... It ... By: YOUGETVIOLENCE. on 08 Feb 10, 04:30:17 That's crazy... It will damage? the jet parts without water
Jetboats usually ... By: rynoAZ. on 08 Oct 07, 17:00:41 Jetboats usually run the engine forward - you can tell this one does because the blower belt is always driven by the front of the crank, and this one is at the fore end of the boat. So with a distributor at the rear of the block and non-siamesed headers, I would make an educated guess that? it's a Big Block Chev.
Ironic considering it's towed by a Ford and sitting at a Ford dealership.
good enough for me! ... By: ALITL8. on 12 Aug 07, 02:05:22 good enough for me! thanks again!?
thanks jdh... ... By: ALITL8. on 11 Aug 07, 21:08:06 thanks jdh... explain to dufus up there what the "black hawk" thing is. i know its a water jet of sorts but dont know? the technical word for it.
i? dont know, i was ... By: ALITL8. on 04 Aug 07, 21:30:21 i? dont know, i was just a spectator :o)
what? sorta motor ... By: murphdaholdenhero. on 01 Aug 07, 11:25:56 what? sorta motor is she runnin mate?
![This aint rocket science, ya\](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/c2OziQ_IXEc/2.jpg "This aint rocket science, ya\")
![This aint rocket science, ya\](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6m3k5x2RSSU/2.jpg "This aint rocket science, ya\")
![This aint rocket science, ya\](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZTspN4FPGOY/2.jpg "This aint rocket science, ya\")
![98stalkercobra\](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_lSUFBa1BiE/2.jpg "98stalkercobra\")
![Brad\](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vLQTF0KYDaA/2.jpg "Brad\")
![Bobby Jackson\](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/lJ5Nd0le480/2.jpg "Bobby Jackson\")
![Bobby Jackson\](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3qi0qlH-6ek/2.jpg "Bobby Jackson\")
![Fast Eddie\](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AMbgPlxzPLo/2.jpg "Fast Eddie\")
![Fast Eddie\](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/brfOKctIBg8/2.jpg "Fast Eddie\")
Latest comments made on this video:
By: ALITL8. on 05 Sep 09, 21:01:57
thanks for your comments, rating and compliment, cubmasterflex. i actually used diesel fuel for this little demonstration though. not that it really matters because office fires (which are supposedly responsible for the destruction of WTC 7) don't cause at or near free fall speed collapses of steel/concrete/glass buildings... well, except for? this one time when it caused the collapse of 3.
By: cubmasterflex. on 01 Sep 09, 18:59:25
Couldn't fit this into the other two, but thanks for this video man. You definitely demonstrated the idea everyone's been arguing about for years? very simply. And Im sure the kids bitching about it being too simple are also bitching at the videos with actual chemical equations for being too complex. 5 stars.
By: cubmasterflex. on 01 Sep 09, 18:56:26
And anyone who knows anything about chemistry knows that the AMOUNT of matter doesn't affect the temperature at which it burns, nor does the amount of fuel. So, unless the WTC had something inside of it already that burns hotter than either of those fuels it just doesn't add up. It's a perfectly set up experiment that I don't see anyone else testing. And anyone who thinks that the government would actually allow? a test like this with laboratory controlled conditions needs to lay down the crack.
By: cubmasterflex. on 01 Sep 09, 18:52:56
Let me just throw this out there. All of you people hating on this guy for not having a "scientific experiment" are very, very stupid. If you actually look up what he told? you to look up you'd see that A-1 Jet Fuel burns at 287.5 °C. Gasoline burns at 471°-560°C. So, any idiot can conclude that gas is hotter, which is what he's using. PLUS, the metal that he's using, ESPECIALLY INCLUDING THE FRYING PAN, is MUCH weaker than the structural steel used in the towers, and NONE OF THAT EVEN MELTED.
By: ALITL8. on 12 May 09, 19:45:27
where's the wreckage? where's the investigation? where's the reconstruction? i didn't say? anything about what hit the Pentagon or crashed in PA. answer the question!
By: Archonis. on 12 May 09, 19:35:02
Let me guess, you don't think an airliner hit the Pentagon or crashed in PA either?!? More uneducated conspiracy nonsense brought to you by George Soros. Next time? I need asbestos removed I'll give you a call!
By: ALITL8. on 12 May 09, 19:16:14
where's the aluminum from the Pentagon or? Shankesville? in past airline/NASA incidents there has always been a collection of wreckage to examine... where's the wreckage? where's the reconstruction? ever seen the wreckage from the Space Shuttle?? YES YOU HAVE!! they gathered it all up, put it in a warehouse and ran a proper investigation. dont waste my time Archon. didn't get enough in our conversation on MySpace??
By: Archonis. on 12 May 09, 04:43:49
Where's the aluminum from the airliners? What happens when you add 90,000 liters of Burning jet fuel and 50,000 tons of floors per level travelling at 32ft per sec^2? This ain't rocket science but it don't look like? NASA needs an On-Site Supervisor with an A+B license.
By: ALITL8. on 02 Mar 09, 03:24:08
wasn't really looking? for scientific credit hence the title... common sense will do when it comes to fire, structural steel, heat transfer, etc., etc. anyone that's ever used a cutting torch should understand my simple man science.
By: CHANNELMICHAEL. on 07 Feb 09, 12:51:07
You? need to do this to scale to merit any scientific credit.
By: ALITL8. on 10 Aug 08, 20:37:04
machines creating what temperature? what is the open air burn temperature of jet fuel or should i say kerosene? i can guarantee you its NOT 1100-1800°F. those temperature can ONLY be reached in a controlled environment (i.e. fire triangle). there are definitely many variables to consider but the fact remains, heat from those fires is NOT what brought? those buildings down... fireproofing or not. watch my playlists on 9/11 science, building fires, controlled demolition and car fires
By: pontolones. on 10 Aug 08, 18:56:07
no, i don't know anything about installing underground storage tanks, but i do know that that is a lot different than knowing about the supporting structure of a 100 story building. your little experiment, while fun, is not accurately reproducing all the factors involved in a structure like the wtc buildings. you need machines recreating the same temperature,? and the same type and amount of stress that these structures had on them. its not rocket science to know that this isn't real science.
By: ALITL8. on 10 Aug 08, 04:48:03
hey there city slicker... what is jet fuel? apparently the "experts" dont know either nor have they come up with anything better than a "working hypothesis (THEORY)" for how "3" buildings managed to collapse in 7 yrs of "professional" investigation. bet you didnt know that gasoline burns? hotter than jet fuel, did ya? how much do you know about the fire triangle? how much do you know about fuel and fire safety? Google: On-Site Supervisor License A+B this redneck knows a little more than YOU!
By: pontolones. on 10 Aug 08, 03:08:26
THIS JUST IN, SOME REDNECK IN TEXAS PROVED 9/11 AN INSIDE JOB, USING A SKILLET AND SOME DIESEL FUEL IN HIS DRIVEWAY.? lul. can you please do some more mind blowing (and extremely scientific) experiments?
By: ALITL8. on 04 Jul 08, 20:30:12
thanks, if you look? at my playlists you can embed the code of all 4... spread the truth!!
By: Lungyao1. on 04 Jul 08, 14:44:57
Great? video